Could be, is the job of moderation to adapt the content. They are the ones that have keep an alignment with OpenAI’s way. Anyway. Back to images.

I really really want that lamp.

we were talking the in group to make some Dev Forum Swag with @VeitB — Maybe one day?

Design swag you say? I want 30% of gross sales for any of my designs.

I’m not even allowed to say goodbye to you guys with dignity.

That last little fact just about pushed me to escalate to the company.

is this not the chatter and slop thread or was i mistaken?

For this place for images with AI…

DysTopia:

Dev Forum Swag

Rizzmaxx with this apparel line, sure to gain attention

It was a topic we considered very briefly .

May I offer a turtle? Acrylic print would be nice!

Oops, the API parameters reused here cost $0.23 in API credits.

So, in unnecessarily high quality, suitable for HD resolution desktops…and demonstratring that you’re going to get watermarked patterned fonts to ruin imagery and the quality of your concept no matter how much you crank up the quality or size:

Did the test with these, seems it’s not easy to reproduce

The Japanese image above does verify with SynthID, but detection takes larger content then just a close crop of the text. Note though in the right bottom stroke and the center strokes where they join, unnecessary noise that is not solid white nor like a brush hair:

So: Append to my prompt to see any improvement in the “printing” to be coaxed or guarded against by language (plus vary the font colors)

Text is solid color strokes of antialiased smooth fonts, where each glyph and word is one color choice but each style of face can also have a color change, and has no artifacts that look like ink stamping or grain in the font strokes.

It seems the AI does have control of the noisy starry grainy symptom often seen (quality:medium):

Enhance!

But even early today I note this spoiling of infographic background colors also: