LessWrong AI
2026-06-29 16:32 UTC
By interstice
USR-0152-20260629-community-fo-5ada2912
Blog Intro Post
Hello LW, as I've mentioned I'm starting a blog, here's the intro post! Intro 0.0.1 Hello, welcome to (the main sequence of) my website. 0.0.2 Its purpose is to collect various observations and thoughts of mine, centered around the question of.... 0.1 Why these laws of physics? 0.1.1 Of the various things humanity has learned about the nature of reality, perhaps the most striking is the discovery of the laws of physics: a set of computable mathematical rules which govern almost all of reality as it's known to us. Even the human mind seems to be the product of physical processes in the brain. 0.1.2 A further striking discovery of the 20th century was computational universality: there is a relatively low threshold beyond which a model of computation is capable of emulating any other. 0.1.2.1 Combined with 0.1.1, this seems to imply that all of reality can be thought of as a relatively simple form of computation, perhaps a Turing machine with a small number of states. 0.1.3 Or can it? Although the laws of physics seem to be computable, they have a mathematical structure that goes far beyond an ordinary Turing machine. They take place in continuous space and time, have manifold conservation laws and group theoretic symmetries. Perhaps most weirdly of all, they are quantum mechanical in nature. 0.1.4 This raises the question: why? If reality "could" have been a more generic Turing machine or a cellular automaton, why isn't it? Wait, or does this question even make sense? What doe…
Hello LW, as I've mentioned I'm starting a blog, here's the intro post! Intro 0.0.1 Hello, welcome to (the main sequence of) my website. 0.0.2 Its purpose is to collect various observations and thoughts of mine, centered around the question of.... 0.1 Why these laws of physics? 0.1.1 Of the various things humanity has learned about the nature of reality, perhaps the most striking is the discovery of the laws of physics: a set of computable mathematical rules which govern almost all of reality as it's known to us. Even the human mind seems to be the product of physical processes in the brain. 0.1.2 A further striking discovery of the 20th century was computational universality: there is a relatively low threshold beyond which a model of computation is capable of emulating any other. 0.1.2.1 Combined with 0.1.1, this seems to imply that all of reality can be thought of as a relatively simple form of computation, perhaps a Turing machine with a small number of states. 0.1.3 Or can it? Although the laws of physics seem to be computable, they have a mathematical structure that goes far beyond an ordinary Turing machine. They take place in continuous space and time, have manifold conservation laws and group theoretic symmetries. Perhaps most weirdly of all, they are quantum mechanical in nature. 0.1.4 This raises the question: why? If reality "could" have been a more generic Turing machine or a cellular automaton, why isn't it? Wait, or does this question even make sense? What doe…
Full article content could not be extracted automatically. Read the original below.
Source:
LessWrong AI
· lesswrong.com