@recursionrecursion1 I see 
I guess we complement each other 
DysTopia:
Yes and ..Then does this fit?
Le Petit Prince
.. you just made me think one step further 
As a child, Le Petit Prince wasn’t really my thing. While my classmates were reading it, I was much more interested in books about animal behavior 
But now I realize that’s actually not so far away: interacting with animals means interacting with other kinds of intelligence. And the more different the intelligence, the less useful rigid rules become - and the more important underlying principles are.
Horses, dogs and cats, humans, AIs… different minds, different rules - but some principles travel surprisingly well
Just a small but very important Prinz, right’?
@recursionrecursion1 and @DysTopia
Okay, you two .... accidentally collided in my head 
One of you gave me Le Petit Prince and balloons.
The other gave me “They float… they all float… and you’ll float too…”
And now my brain refuses to behave:
balloons float → IT → “float” → floating-point numbers → wave-particle duality
…while apparently the red balloons float higher than the blue ones 

So at this point I have only one scientifically irresponsible conclusion:
They all float - just not to the same value

I guess this is what happens when different minds contribute different associations to the same evolving idea. None of us has to see the whole chain alone - we complement each other very well


Well, village dogs have their own system: escape from their gardens, rendezvous at the village square, form a gang, then tour the village together annoying everyone. 
Cat serenade: solo performance.
Dog gang: distributed system with spontaneous synchronization.
At this rate we’re only one step away from the Kuramoto model 


Those images are absolutely stunning!
Thank you. They are based on Greek Mythology
P.S.
CAThartic and CATerwauling were the prompts for my cats 
