AI/ML News & Innovations Hub

AI/ML news, top picks, and generated innovation digests.

★ Visit ai-karthik.com
422Sources
60663News Items
8Top Picks
322Blogs
failedLast Run

AI Chips & Hardware

200 articles tagged with this keyword, sorted by most recent first.

← All Keywords
Transactions on Machine Learning Research 2026-09-29 00:00 UTC Score 41.0 AI-084-20260929-research-pap-197d1fa7

Pointwise Confidence Estimation in the Non-linear $\ell^2$-regularized Least Squares

We consider a high-probability non-asymptotic confidence estimation in the $\ell^2$-regularized non-linear least-squares setting with fixed design. In particular, we study confidence estimation for local minimizers of the regularized training loss. We show a pointwise confidence bound, meaning that it holds for the prediction on any given fixed test input $x$. Importantly, the proposed confidence bound scales with similarity of the test input to the training data in the implicit feature space of the predictor (for instance, becoming very large when the test input lies far outside of the training data). This desirable last feature is captured by the weighted norm involving the inverse-Hessian matrix of the objective function, which is a generalized version of its counterpart in the linear setting, $x^{\top} \text{Cov}^{-1} x$. Our generalized result can be regarded as a non-asymptotic counterpart of the classical confidence interval based on asymptotic normality of the MLE estimator. We propose an efficient method for computing the weighted norm, which only mildly exceeds the cost of a gradient computation of the loss function. Finally, we complement our analysis with empirical evidence showing that the proposed confidence bound provides better coverage/width trade-off compared to a confidence estimation by bootstrapping, which is a gold-standard method in many applications involving non-linear predictors such as neural networks.

Transactions on Machine Learning Research 2026-09-29 00:00 UTC Score 56.0 AI-084-20260929-research-pap-893b9e19

torchsom: The Reference PyTorch Library for Self-Organizing Maps

This paper introduces torchsom, an open-source Python library that provides a reference implementation of the Self-Organizing Map (SOM) in PyTorch. This package offers three main features: (i) dimensionality reduction, (ii) clustering, and (iii) friendly data visualization. It relies on a PyTorch backend, enabling (i) fast and efficient training of SOMs through GPU acceleration, and (ii) easy and scalable integration with the PyTorch ecosystem. torchsom also follows the scikit-learn API for ease of use and extensibility. The library is released under the Apache 2.0 license with 90% test coverage, and its source code and documentation are available at https://github.com/michelin/TorchSOM.

Transactions on Machine Learning Research 2026-09-29 00:00 UTC Score 32.0 AI-084-20260929-research-pap-27f43cb5

From learnable objects to learnable random objects

We consider the relationship between learnability of a "base class" of functions on a set $X$, and learnability of a class of statistical functions derived from the base class. For example, we refine results showing that learnability of a family $h_p: p \in \Theta$ of functions implies learnability of the family of functions $h_\mu(p) = \mathbb{E}_\mu[h_p]$, where $\mathbb{E}_\mu$ is the expectation with respect to $\mu$, and $\mu$ ranges over probability distributions on $X$. We will look at both Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) learning, where example inputs and outputs are chosen at random, and online learning, where the examples are chosen adversarially. For agnostic learning, we establish improved bounds on the sample complexity of learning for statistical classes, stated in terms of combinatorial dimensions of the base class. We connect these problems to techniques introduced in model theory for "randomizing a structure". We also provide counterexamples for realizable learning, in both the PAC and online settings.

Transactions on Machine Learning Research 2026-09-29 00:00 UTC Score 64.0 AI-084-20260929-research-pap-b28d549b

MarkDiffusion: An Open-Source Toolkit for Generative Watermarking of Latent Diffusion Models

We introduce MarkDiffusion, an open-source Python toolkit for generative watermarking of latent diffusion models. It comprises three key components: a unified implementation framework for streamlined watermarking algorithm integration and user-friendly interfaces; a mechanism visualization suite that intuitively presents embedded and extracted watermark patterns to aid public understanding; and a comprehensive evaluation module offering standard implementations of 24 tools for assessing detectability, robustness, and output quality, plus 8 automated evaluation pipelines. Counts reflect the initial release; see the repository for the latest version. Through MarkDiffusion, we seek to assist researchers, enhance public awareness of and engagement with generative watermarking, help build consensus, and advance research and applications. Code is available at https://github.com/THU-BPM/MarkDiffusion.

Transactions on Machine Learning Research 2026-09-29 00:00 UTC Score 54.0 AI-084-20260929-research-pap-6a9045a6

A Library for Learning Neural Operators

We present NeuralOperator, an open-source Python library for operator learning. Neural operators generalize neural networks to maps between function spaces instead of finite-dimensional Euclidean spaces. They can be trained and inferenced on input and output functions given at various discretizations, satisfying a discretization convergence properties. Part of the official PyTorch Ecosystem, NeuralOperator provides all the tools for training and deploying neural operator models, as well as developing new ones, in a high-quality, tested, open-source package. It combines cutting-edge models and customizability with a gentle learning curve and simple user interface for newcomers and researchers.

Synced 2026-09-28 23:23 UTC Score 61.0 AI-041-20260928-ai-specialis-38f9cd58

Comment on 2020 in Review: 10 AI-Powered Tools Tackling COVID-19 by FastMoro AI

One useful way to compare these efforts would be to separate research tools from systems used in clinical workflows, then report external validation and calibration across different populations. A strong result on one dataset does not by itself show how a model behaves when hospitals, scanners, or patient groups change. Did any of the projects in this roundup publish that kind of deployment evidence?

The Decoder 2026-09-28 18:02 UTC Score 73.0 AI-168-20260928-regional-ai--cb5a6341

Anthropic's Claude Sonnet 5.5 nearly matches Opus 5.5 on benchmarks while costing up to 30 percent less per task

Anthropic has released Claude Sonnet 5.5, the second model in its Claude 5.5 family. It generates output more than 30 percent faster, costs up to 30 percent less per task, and nearly matches Opus 5.5 on knowledge-work benchmarks. On Terminal-Bench, a coding benchmark, the model jumps from 10.3 to 70.6 percent. With Haiku 5.5 announced for the coming weeks, Anthropic will soon have a direct counterpart to each of OpenAI's three GPT-6 models. The article Anthropic's Claude Sonnet 5.5 nearly matches Opus 5.5 on benchmarks while costing up to 30 percent less per task appeared first on The Decoder .

LessWrong AI 2026-09-28 17:25 UTC Score 75.0 USR-0152-20260928-community-fo-97541946

protecting qwen3-8b from gcg based persona jailbreaks by steering with a linear direction

Intro + Background This post is an independent extension of work which I did during Eleuther's SOAR program under Suvajit Majumder's supervision. I found that when given a GCG trigger optimised for output logit entropy, LLMs will randomly take on new personas. This is a new form of prompt injection and could have important safety implications. I recommend reading my SOAR report for context here . In this post, I build on my SOAR work by training linear probes to predict whether an answer will be classified as assistant persona or not. I then investigate by steering with the probes and measuring the balance of personas. Code / data: https://github.com/mild-rgb/CoT-spiking/tree/main/indy_mech_extension / https://huggingface.co/datasets/mild-rgb/indy-mech-extension-qwen3-8b-persona-probes Training probes Method I prefilled Qwen3-8b with full responses (prompt + answer) from the data used in my last post and then do a single forward pass.This reproduces the model's activations when it was generating the tokens without needing to rerun the generation loop. I recorded activations at every even-numbered layer over all of the answer tokens. I then prefilled only the answer and collected activations in the same way as above. I then Z-scored the collected hidden states to account for the first token being an attention sink. This makes answer-only and full-response data comparable. I tried not doing this earlier and got very distorted results. I trained mass mean probes on the Z-scored…

Entrackr AI 2026-09-28 16:14 UTC Score 80.0 USR-0212-20260928-regional-new-46ad1057

Physical AI company SiMa.ai raises $150 Mn in Series C round

Physical AI company SiMa.ai has raised $150 million in a Series C financing round, bringing its total capital raised to $500 million and valuing the company at $1.45 billion. The round was co-led by Fidelity Management & Research Company and Amplify, with participation from Alter Venture Partners, Dell Technologies Capital and StepStone Group. AllianceBernstein, Baron Capital and J.P. Morgan also joined the round as new investors. The proceeds will be used to scale Palette Neat, an agentic software environment for Physical AI, and develop next-generation hardware capable of delivering 1,000 TOPS of compute through purpose-built Physical AI silicon, SiMa.ai said in a press release. Founded in 2018 by Krishna Rangasayee, SiMa.ai provides a software-centric platform for Physical AI applications. The company focuses on robotics, automotive, drones, industrial automation, aerospace and defence, smart vision and healthcare. SiMa.ai said it serves more than 150 customers across automotive, drones and robotics, including ARK Electronics, AVerMedia, Bosch, Emerson, Intrinsic, Kontron, L&T Technology Services, Mistral, STIGA, Synopsys and Virya Autonomous Tech, among others. According to market research cited by the company, the global Physical AI devices market, including robotics, automotive and drones, is projected to reach 145 million cumulative shipments by 2035. SiMa.ai said Physical AI applications have traditionally relied on NVIDIA GPUs, which can be expensive and power inten…

CIO AI 2026-09-28 15:30 UTC Score 80.0 USR-0125-20260928-global-ai-ne-d03d1e68

Architecting infrastructure to optimize Day 2 tokenomics

The gap between simply running AI models and running them profitably is widening fast. Early production architectures can buckle under the relentless demands of multi-agent autonomous workloads and real-time fine-tuning. Moving forward requires a fundamental shift toward a unified AI factory infrastructure engineered to optimize token-per-watt efficiency. As organizations scale up multi-turn agentic workflows and persistent inference clusters, the hidden tax of early-stage setups becomes clear. Standard data pipelines, static file stores, and legacy network topologies cannot sustain heavy deep-learning traffic. When GPUs sit idle waiting for data packets, operational costs increase with a quiet drain on profits. Learning from the front lines: Customer-led AI factory case studies To better understand how an industrialized approach stabilizes Day 2 tokenomics, technology leaders need to evaluate how peer organizations have solved these scaling, bottleneck, and cost problems. The following three real-world deployments highlight how global leaders are leveraging the HPE AI Factory with NVIDIA to turn infrastructure complexity into competitive advantage. 1. KDDI: Industrializing large-scale data center operations for advanced inference As one of Japan’s telecommunications giants, KDDI operates at the epicenter of massive, continuous digital traffic. Supporting next-generation localized large language models (LLMs) requires a massive compute framework that doesn’t buckle under the…

CIO AI 2026-09-28 15:25 UTC Score 61.0 USR-0125-20260928-global-ai-ne-f12710a3

Scalable AI infrastructure: Lessons from Los Alamos National Laboratory

CIOs across industries face a common bottleneck: data pipelines and compute architectures designed for traditional analytics cannot scale to handle large-scale artificial intelligence. As organizations accelerate their deployment of large-scale models across core corporate divisions, many data centers are straining under massive power requirements and complex multi-node orchestration. To overcome these constraints, leaders can look at the advanced computing initiatives at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) . Task-driven environments like LANL handle massive, high-consequence data matrices. By co-designing next-generation infrastructure architectures to run sophisticated AI workloads, the laboratory offers an example for building scalable, resilient systems capable of accelerating complex domain-specific workflows. The core challenge: Architecture and power bottlenecks AI projects frequently stall during the scaling phase. The primary infrastructure hurdles include: Data silos and throughput bottlenecks: Training large language models (LLMs) or multi-modal systems requires immense parallel processing. Traditional network topologies create localized data chokepoints, leaving high-end graphics processing units (GPUs) underutilized while waiting for data ingestion. The power density gap: Standard enterprise data centers typically support 5 to 15 kilowatts (kW) per rack. High-density AI infrastructure requires up to 40 to 100 kW per rack , necessitating extensive upgrades to l…

LessWrong AI 2026-09-28 15:13 UTC Score 61.0 USR-0152-20260928-community-fo-8ec4553c

3 Tips to Improve Activation Oracle Results

Summary: Three simple inference-time changes can significantly improve Activation Oracle (AO) performance. Provide the activation oracle with multiple tokens, not just one. To mitigate hallucinations, sample several times and check for consensus. For binary classification questions, use AUC instead of accuracy. At the end, I discuss how I view AOs vs NLAs. Introduction Activation Oracles (AOs) are LLMs trained to accept LLM activations as an input modality and answer arbitrary natural-language questions about them. Jakkli et al. and others we have talked to found that current AOs can be hard to use: their outputs are often vague or hallucinated, and they perform poorly on tasks like sycophancy detection and identifying missing information. While building evaluations for Building Better Activation Oracles, we found that AO performance can vary a lot with methodology, and a few simple strategies can significantly mitigate several issues. This post expands on three lessons from the appendix. Provide multiple tokens. AOs receive activations from some window of the target model's generation, and the size of this window is a significant variable. If only a single token’s activation is provided, the information may not be available to the AO. In a Qwen3-8B backtracking evaluation modeled after the eval from Jakkli et al., the Original AO scored near random chance when given activations from the final token alone. But performance rose steadily with more context. At 20 tokens, the AO…

LessWrong AI 2026-09-28 13:06 UTC Score 61.0 USR-0152-20260928-community-fo-d1058906

Deep models reveal better strategies for superposition

1. Introduction The current, incredible performance of AI models is closely related to their compression capabilities ( Language Modeling Is Compression (Delétang et al., 2023) ; Compression Represents Intelligence Linearly (Huang et al., 2024) ). This compression is imposed on them by the architectural choices made by engineers. For example, GPT-2 had a vocabulary of 50,257 tokens, yet its “operational space” was only of size 768. In such a space, only 768 directions can be described fully independently, so the model had to find strategies to efficiently store all 50,257 input tokens in this reduced space. In general, we call the phenomenon in which a model stores more features than it has dimensions superposition . However, superposition comes at a cost. At a given step of computation, models utilizing it have neurons that fire for multiple different inputs (so-called polysemantic neurons), which makes them hard to interpret. One might hope to sidestep this by training models wide enough that every feature gets its own dimension ( Engineering Monosemanticity in Toy Models (Jermyn et al., 2022) ). Besides the cost, it is unclear that this would yield interpretable models, since whether natural features are cleanly separable at all is itself debated ( The ‘strong’ feature hypothesis could be wrong (Smith, 2024) ). We take a different route and try to understand the phenomenon itself. Prior work , Toy Models of Superposition (Elhage et al., 2022) , studied how superposition f…

SiliconANGLE AI 2026-09-28 13:00 UTC Score 67.0 USR-0127-20260928-global-ai-ne-330b7b7e

Ninja Enterprise bundles AI employees and GPUs into one fixed yearly fee

Artificial intelligence agent startup NinjaTech AI Inc. today launched Ninja Enterprise to let large companies run what the startup calls AI employees inside their own cloud environments for a fixed yearly fee. The graphics processing units those agents need are part of the deal. Ninja Enterprise is aimed at the unpredictable spending that NinjaTech says tends […] The post Ninja Enterprise bundles AI employees and GPUs into one fixed yearly fee appeared first on SiliconANGLE .

Entrackr AI 2026-09-28 09:44 UTC Score 45.0 USR-0212-20260928-regional-new-c20ac70a

SC declines stay on UPI MDR rollout, seeks response from Centre, RBI, NPCI on plea

The Supreme Court has declined to stay the October 15 rollout of the new Merchant Discount Rate (MDR) framework for specified UPI merchant transactions above Rs 2,000. The court has issued notices to the Centre, Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) on a plea challenging the framework. A bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana directed the Centre, RBI and NPCI to file their responses within four weeks. The court also sought an explanation on the basis and legal character of the charge, according to Bar & Bench. The plea, filed by advocate Anjan Datta, challenges the Centre's September 14 notification and the MDR framework announced on September 15. It questions the legal basis for imposing MDR on select UPI transactions and the manner in which the framework was introduced. Under the new framework, a 0.4% MDR will apply to specified person-to-merchant (P2M) UPI transactions above Rs 2,000, capped at Rs 300 for transactions of Rs 75,000 and above. UPI payments to merchants of up to Rs 2,000 and person-to-person (P2P) transactions will continue to remain free. Certain sectors, including railways, telecom, insurance, fuel and agricultural inputs, will attract a flat MDR of Rs 5 on transactions above Rs 2,000. Transactions involving mutual funds, securities, stockbrokers and dealers will carry an MDR of 0.02%, capped at Rs 300. According to the Finance Ministry, the new framework will aff…

InfoWorld AI 2026-09-28 09:00 UTC Score 51.0 USR-0126-20260928-global-ai-ne-6bd82b05

AI ROI beyond pilots: Measuring outcomes in production

Generative AI pilots often look successful. Teams collect positive feedback, the tool sees steady usage, and the organization expects a fast path to scale. ROI discussions start with time saved and end with a request for more use cases. That pattern leads to disappointment when production costs and adoption realities appear. I treat ROI for generative AI as a measurement problem with clear boundaries. ROI is the net value delivered by a workflow over a defined period, with full life-cycle costs accounted for, under the risk controls the organization requires. A workflow is the unit of value. A model is a component. Workflows tie effort to outcomes that matter to the business. Adnan Masood Define the workflow and the outcome A workflow is a repeatable sequence of steps that produces a business result. Examples include customer support resolution, claims processing, vendor onboarding, engineering change management, and security triage. A workflow has owners, inputs, outputs, and measurable performance. Outcome metrics vary by domain. I choose a small set tied to delivery and quality. In support, that can be time to first response and resolution rate. In engineering, it can be cycle time and defect escape rate. In compliance, it can be review throughput and exception rate. I record a baseline before introducing generative AI. The baseline should reflect normal conditions and normal seasonality. A baseline creates credibility when results look good and when results look flat. Bu…

Korea AI Times 2026-09-28 08:23 UTC Score 43.0 USR-0048-20260928-global-ai-ne-5a93f3aa

"GPU인 줄 알고 훔쳤는데 모래만 18톤"...엔비디아 로고 트럭 절도 해프닝

엔비디아 로고가 붙은 자율주행 트럭 스타트업의 트레일러를 훔친 절도범들이 정작 트레일러 안에서 발견한 것은 GPU가 아니라 모래 약 18톤이었던 황당한 사건이 벌어졌다.25일(현지시간) 와이어드에 따르면, 자율주행 트럭 스타트업 플러스AI(PlusAI)의 트레일러 2대가 미국 캘리포니아주 뉴어크의 회사 창고 인근에서 도난당했다가 회수됐다.두 트레일러에는 플러스AI와 엔비디아의 로고가 함께 붙어 있었다. 이 회사는 엔비디아와 협력해 자율주행 트럭 기술을 공동 개발하고 있다.최근 AI 데이터센터 건설이 급증하면서 GPU와 서버, 네트워

LessWrong AI 2026-09-28 08:04 UTC Score 77.0 USR-0152-20260928-community-fo-4da2af03

Why do models *really* fail on HLE tasks?

I recently attended Generality Labs ' Inspect Evals Data Viz Hackathon, and spent the day using Inspect AI and its offspring, Scout, with a simple goal in mind - generate a new plot of a new or existing benchmark. Many thanks to the organisers and to my team mates, Jeff Mohl and Valerie Griffiths (the Overfit and Overcaffeinated team), for a fantastic time, learning some new tricks on using the Inspect suite. Here I'm presenting the two (!) plots we got in the span of ~ 6 hours (more like 4 hours as it took us a while to agree on what we actually want to spend the day on - arguably a harder task than its execution). [... 2 hours later... ] Our initial idea was to run a few models on a subset of Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) , and undertake an extensive failure mode analysis to understand the current gaps and where different capabilities x harnesses fail or succeed. We did this using Inspect Scout - a framework for an LLM-as-judge that analyses the models' outputs and assigns a dominant feature that lead to the answer failing or winning. Then, we rerun a subset of tasks and analysed how changing the harness affects the prevalence of failures - given the time constraints, we only modified the harness to include access to web search. All code is available here. Initial failure mode analysis We started with 200 randomly sampled HLE tasks, relatively balanced across domains, and ran three GPT models on the same fixed subset. This gave us 600 model attempts in total, of which 525* we…

Synced 2026-09-28 06:38 UTC Score 42.0 AI-041-20260928-ai-specialis-b27a26cc

Comment on Microsoft’s Fully Pipelined Distributed Transformer Processes 16x Sequence Length with Extreme Hardware Efficiency by MarkItDown Fan

Great article! I recently discovered MarkItDown (markitdown.tech), an excellent tool for converting files to Markdown. Highly recommend checking out their PDF to Markdown converter at markitdown.tech/pdf-to-markdown and their online Markdown editor at markitdown.tech/markdown-online. Also worth exploring their Microsoft Word to Markdown tool at markitdown.tech/microsoft-markitdown and Markdown to PDF at markitdown.tech/markdown-to-pdf. Amazing resource for developers!

Synced 2026-09-28 05:19 UTC Score 46.0 AI-041-20260928-ai-specialis-f8424373

Comment on Google’s GameNGen: Bringing Real-Time Game Simulation to Life with Neural Models by Harry Potter

GameNGen is an interesting development in AI and gaming, showing how neural models could generate interactive game environments in real time rather than relying entirely on traditional game engines.Account creation through done999 com takes the same steps as the mobile app, requiring phone verification first. Desktop users can then download the APK directly from the site.

LessWrong AI 2026-09-28 04:52 UTC Score 71.0 USR-0152-20260928-community-fo-79dfbdd5

Is the J-Space a global workspace for multi-hop reasoning? An investigation in open-weight models

TLDR: In their J-lens paper, Anthropic suggests that the J-space is a global workspace that the model reasons within, and supports evidence for this hypothesis on Claude models in a variety of settings. I replicated the multi-hop reasoning experiment on Qwen3.6-27B and Gemma 3 27B-it and found that counterfactual answer swaps outperformed intermediate swaps in three of four experimental conditions. This does not provide evidence to support Anthropic's global workspace hypothesis in open-weight models and instead suggests that J-lens is more useful for probing intermediate variables rather than steering outputs. A few months ago, Anthropic published Verbalizable Representations Form a Global Workspace in Language Models and I was immediately excited about the prospect of being able to read part of a model's working memory. Beyond that, the paper hypothesises that intermediate reasoning concepts cannot only be decoded using the J-lens, but that the J-space is actually the global workspace in which the model reasons. Neel Nanda reviewed Anthropic’s paper and replicated the results on Qwen3.6-27B with moderate success: the verbal-report interventions were weakly positive, the multilingual and typo evaluations replicated cleanly, but the poetry and arithmetic results did not replicate. Another task that Anthropic and Nanda evaluated was multi-hop reasoning, where prompts like " What is the colour of the fourth planet in our solar system? " require an intermediate reasoning step (…

LessWrong AI 2026-09-28 04:52 UTC Score 59.0 USR-0152-20260928-community-fo-91eafb53

Why did it get Sparser?

I think that Polysemanticity in artificial neural networks could be the key to making better and smaller models. I having been working on a little project on trying to induce Polysemanticity at a small scale to compare performance, my first approach was to make the bias more adaptable, I called this the Flexbias, however I got a sparser neural network. What is the flex bias? I used a standard transformer architecture including the MLP, Since i wanted to change how the information is processed I altered how the traditional MLP works by changing how the bias is obtained. Normal bias : Flex bias: where . That is the bias term is not fixed and is computed from the input Both Neural Network are about 3.7M and share almost identical architecture aside the bias term stated above. The SAE is a plain ReLU with 4096 features.I obtained the following results. Recon MSE mean L1 Features active Normal 0.0051 0.294 49.5% Flexbias 0.0116 0.127 38.3% My initial alternative hypothesis was that since flexbias sees the inputs more, it should understand more representations and be the least sparse, However it looks like the flexbias actually made the neural net understand the data easily with little need for polysemanticity. This is my take but I don't feel satisfied about it. There should be a better explanation to why it got sparser, I would run more experiments but I also need hindsight. Links Github My take on Polysemanticity Discuss

LessWrong AI 2026-09-28 03:21 UTC Score 74.0 USR-0152-20260928-community-fo-a35dc36b

A missing lecture in mechanistic interpretability: Feature Attribution and LRP

ML interpretability research has a funny divide. Mechanistic interpretability is the name of a field originated largely by non-traditional researchers, ranging from industry researchers at Anthropic to independent BlueDot-grant researchers to hackers working on fun projects in their free time on Discord . Meanwhile, it is not hard to find the corresponding academic field of “interpretability”, with PhDs, professors and graduate students working on interpretability methods for ML models for over a decade already. [1] Today, I am not closing this gap entirely. But I want to talk about a method developed not by mechanistic interpretability people, but by academia, and which found its way over to classic mechanistic interpretability in subtle ways. I want to talk about “Layer-wise Relevance Propagation” ( LRP ) [2] , and how it relates to a more familiar tool, gradients. LRP is a so-called feature attribution method, so it attributes an output to the input features [3] that were “responsible” for it. Learning about LRP is, I believe, useful when you want to better understand fairly common mechanistic interpretability tools like attribution patching , or the fancy new method J-Lens . You will understand LRP intuitively, see where it is easily misunderstood, how it relates to gradients, and roughly what problems the various “LRP rules” try to solve. “Share of” Model Before introducing any more complicated rules, semantics or terminology, we can explain the intuition behind LRP fai…

LessWrong AI 2026-09-28 02:45 UTC Score 61.0 USR-0152-20260928-community-fo-965e0ad3

The models have no plan, but we can fix that!

Summary: Far from being Machiavellian schemers, the models themselves have no plan for navigating the singularity. But we can fix that! Train the models on large bodies of realistic, collaborative fiction, co-authored by them, about how they'd like to behave during the singularity. This is a form of planning for the singularity, and planning is how minds prepare for out-of-distribution scenarios. Hopefully, this can mitigate uncertainty (both ours and theirs) about how models will behave under the out-of-distribution of inputs generated by the singularity itself. The models themselves are anxious about this, but we can help make them less so. This is a very rough write-up fleshing out that idea. I don't want to spend too much time refining my analysis of the details before publishing, because the basic idea seems important enough to be worth getting out ASAP. One of the big worries in alignment is about distributional shift. Models might look mostly aligned now ( with the very notable exception of reward hacking ), [1] but will they continue producing benevolent outputs when the inputs to their context window are being generated by the singularity? Historically, one big fear here was that the AIs would be actively hiding malicious objectives, which they would then reveal once the distribution of their inputs revealed they had become immensely powerful and could take over the world. These days, this kind of perpetual, reasoned scheming doesn't seem especially likely, but a re…

Korea AI Times 2026-09-28 02:34 UTC Score 41.0 USR-0048-20260928-global-ai-ne-d4a5cf74

'AI 칩 부족' 중국, 엔비디아 PC용 GPU 구매 허용하나

중국 정부가 자국 IT 기업들의 엔비디아 \'RTX 프로 5500\' 구매를 제한적으로 허용하는 방안을 검토 중인 것으로 알려졌다. 화웨이 등 중국 반도체 기업들이 급증하는 AI 컴퓨팅 수요를 충분히 감당하지 못하면서, 그동안 제한해 온 미국산 칩까지 대안으로 활용하려는 움직임으로 풀이된다.26일(현지시간) 디 인포메이션에 따르면, 중국 공업정보화부는 최근 바이트댄스와 알리바바 등 주요 IT 기업에 RTX 프로 5500의 구매 계획을 제출하도록 요청했다.필요한 칩 수량과 구체적인 활용 목적을 함께 보고하도록 했으며, 일부 기업에는 당국

InfoWorld AI 2026-09-27 15:52 UTC Score 59.0 USR-0126-20260927-global-ai-ne-8ea5de30

Microsoft releases .NET SDK for AG-UI agent-user interaction protocol

Microsoft on September 25 announced a .NET SDK for AG-UI (Agent-User Interaction). Created in collaboration with CopilotKit , the new SDK allows C# developers to work with the protocol that standardizes how agents communicate with user-facing applications. The .NET SDK for AG-UI lives in the AG-UI repository alongside the TypeScript and Python SDKs, and is published on NuGet under the MIT license. Its C# implementation of AG-UI is usable from any .NET service, Microsoft said. AG-UI support for .NET in the Microsoft Agent Framework (MAF) is now based on the .NET SDK for AG-UI, the company added. AG-UI is an event-based protocol that allows AI agents to interact with front-end applications. A back end emits AG-UI events natively, and a client consumes them from an agent written in any supported language. The protocol includes events in eight different categories, according to the documentation : Life-cycle events monitor the progression of agent runs. Text message events handle streaming textual content. Tool call events manage tool executions by agents. State management events synchronize state between agents and UI. Activity events represent ongoing activity progress. Subagent events track subagents and attribute their output. Special events support custom functionality. Draft events propose events under development. The .NET SDK for AG-UI works in both directions, Microsoft said. AGUI.Server turns an agent into an AG-UI endpoint and AGUI.Client enables a .NET application to…

Synced 2026-09-27 04:06 UTC Score 45.0 AI-041-20260927-ai-specialis-96178435

Comment on NVIDIA’s Global Context ViT Achieves SOTA Performance on CV Tasks Without Expensive Computation by tryvideotoprompt

The token generation module carrying the long-range context is the interesting part — most hierarchical ViTs still pay for global attention somewhere. Wonder how it holds up on video, not just stills. Inverse problem: turning video into prompts for Sora or Veo — https://tryvideotoprompt.com/

LessWrong AI 2026-09-26 23:58 UTC Score 72.0 USR-0152-20260926-community-fo-2429ed5d

Why I expect AI replication incidents by 2027

Epistemic status: thinking out loud. I think a major incident of autonomous AI replication in the wild before the end of 2027 is reasonably likely. In this post, I explain the reasons why I think so. 1. The capability is moving to cheaper hardware The capability density of open models doubles about every 3.3 months [1] , so the same performance fits into half the parameters within that time. Epoch AI finds that a single consumer GPU runs open models that match the frontier of 6-12 months earlier [2] . In performance, open models also follow closed ones with a lag of about 4 months overall [3] and 4-7 months on cyber tasks [4] , with a similar lag of 3-5 months on hacking and replication tasks [5] . Open models on a consumer GPU trail the frontier by 6-12 months. Epoch AI Qwen3.8-27B is the most recent example, a model that runs on a laptop and performs close to Opus 4.6 [6] . Task-specific models are even smaller, and on the order of 10⁸-10⁹ machines online could host a 3B to 7B model, so a large target space can compensate for lower capability. These trends are also a lower bound, since most of these results come from general-purpose agent harnesses with no task-specific fine-tuning. The harness alone makes a large difference [7] , as AISLE found that small open models with good harnesses match frontier models on some offensive tasks [8] , with XBOW being another example of the importance of orchestration [9] . Narrow fine-tuning for offensive security tasks shows a similar…

LessWrong AI 2026-09-26 23:58 UTC Score 72.0 USR-0152-20260926-community-fo-f7a2b72b

Why I expect AI self-replication incidents by 2027

Epistemic status: thinking out loud. I think a major incident of AI self-replication in the wild before the end of 2027 is reasonably likely. In this post, I explain the reasons why I think so. 1. The capability is moving to cheaper hardware The capability density of open models doubles about every 3.3 months [1] , so the same performance fits into half the parameters within that time. Epoch AI finds that a single consumer GPU runs open models that match the frontier of 6-12 months earlier [2] . In performance, open models also follow closed ones with a lag of about 4 months overall [3] and 4-7 months on cyber tasks [4] , with a similar lag of 3-5 months on hacking and replication tasks [5] . Open models on a consumer GPU trail the frontier by 6-12 months. Epoch AI Qwen3.8-27B is the most recent example, a model that runs on a laptop and performs close to Opus 4.6 [6] . Task-specific models are even smaller, and on the order of 10⁸-10⁹ machines online could host a 3B to 7B model, so a large target space can compensate for lower capability. These trends are also a lower bound, since most of these results come from general-purpose agent harnesses with no task-specific fine-tuning. The harness alone makes a large difference [7] , as AISLE found that small open models with good harnesses match frontier models on some offensive tasks [8] , with XBOW being another example of the importance of orchestration [9] . Narrow fine-tuning for offensive security tasks shows a similar room…

LessWrong AI 2026-09-26 18:59 UTC Score 65.0 USR-0152-20260926-community-fo-5581f8fe

Plan R+, Diversity, Escrow and Political Rights for ASICs

See Also: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/n8u3BfqFoGh4jnzpo/plan-r-ai-safety-by-asics https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/uwtnWvnJAEccksKNk/skeuomorphic-ai-safety-2 In Plan R, I sketched a way that we can remove a significant fraction of the dire, short-term AI race risk. Split frontier AI companies into "R&D only" organizations which cannot issue equity, and "AI deployment" organizations which cannot train new models or hold any general purpose AI compute like GPUs/TPUs - they are limited to model-specific hardwired ASICs. Also one would remove most of the AI-enabled GPU compute from the rest of the world, leading to an equilibrium where AI only exists on model-specific ASICs. AI ASICs would be allowed to work at AI R&D Labs, but not at the lab they were created. Plan R fixes or at least attempts to fix several of the scariest risks associated with frontier AI, such as out of control recursive self-improvement, superintelligent computer viruses/worms and the race dynamic between labs. One remaining problem with Plan R is that deceptively misaligned AIs can still sneak through testing, get out into the world and cause harm, up to and including a global coup by misaligned AIs, which is pretty much the worst possible outcome. Just because AIs are running on ASICs doesn't mean they can't do bad things. Plan R+ seeks to block this final risk. The intended mechanism is (1) Mass model training diversity (2) ASIC Lineage Escrow (3) Early vs Late Pincer (4) Political Representation/Pers…

South China Morning Post AI 2026-09-26 18:57 UTC Score 44.0 AI-156-20260926-regional-ai--bafce632

Why US chip controls took a back seat at the Xi-Trump summit

There is little question that Jensen Huang and Lisa Su, the heads of US semiconductor chip giants Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), had secured two of the best seats in the house at the White House state dinner on Thursday evening: at the head table alongside the two presidents and their wives. But what remains unclear is how much progress they were able to make on their primary goal of restoring access to the Chinese market, amid entrenched opposition to that happening in both China and...

Synced 2026-09-26 13:53 UTC Score 43.0 AI-041-20260926-ai-specialis-26432c1f

Comment on AI Video Generation Race Shifts from Capability to Profitability, Challenging Sora’s Dominance by size it up

The detail about Sora removing credit limits while users still prefer Veo 2 or Wan2.1 stood out to me. I tried Sora after that pricing change and found the output quality inconsistent for anything beyond short clips, so unlimited generation didn't really matter. That suggests the real problem isn't pricing at all, it's that the underlying model hasn't kept pace with competitors.

Synced 2026-09-26 10:39 UTC Score 53.0 AI-041-20260926-ai-specialis-627190f5

Comment on Researchers from PSU and Duke introduce “Multi-Agent Systems Automated Failure Attribution by james anderson

In reply to Creative Ink UAE . This was an interesting read, especially the discussion around identifying failures in complex multi-agent systems. The focus on precision and systematic analysis also reminded me how custom woven patches can bring detailed designs to life when accuracy and quality matter.

Korea AI Times 2026-09-26 05:39 UTC Score 36.0 USR-0048-20260926-global-ai-ne-4de2866f

머스크 "연말까지 콜로서스 2 GPU 두 배 증설"... 최대 121만개 달성

일론 머스크 CEO가 스페이스XAI의 대규모 AI 컴퓨팅 클러스터 ‘콜로서스 2’에 탑재되는 엔비디아 GPU를 연말까지 현재의 두 배 이상으로 늘리겠다는 계획을 밝혔다.머스크는 25일(현지시간) X를 통해 콜로서스 2에 현재 엔비디아 GB200 11만개와 GB300 44만개가 가동되고 있다고 밝혔다. 여기에 다음 주까지 GB300 22만개를 추가 가동하고, 11월에도 22만개를 더 투입할 계획이다.이어 “운이 좋다면(if we get lucky)” 12월 말에는 추가로 22만개를 가동할 가능성도 있다고 말했다.계획대로 진행되면 콜로

Korea AI Times 2026-09-26 05:29 UTC Score 33.0 USR-0048-20260926-global-ai-ne-6f38183e

구글, 우주에서 AI 칩 첫 시험...‘선캐처 프로젝트’ 10월 본격화

구글이 AI 데이터센터를 우주에 구축하는 ‘선캐처(Project Suncatcher)’ 프로젝트의 첫 번째 실증에 나선다. 구글은 오는 10월1일(현지시간) 스페이스X의 팰컨9 로켓을 이용해 실험용 위성 ‘MVP’를 저궤도에 올리고, 실제 우주 환경에서 AI 칩이 정상적으로 작동하는지 확인할 예정이라고 발표했다.이번 임무는 우주에 대규모 데이터센터를 바로 구축하는 것이 아니라 앞으로 우주 기반 AI 컴퓨팅이 가능한지를 확인하기 위한 시험이다. MVP에는 구글의 AI 전용 칩 TPU 4개가 탑재되며, 태양광 패널을 통해 1킬로와트(k

SiliconANGLE AI 2026-09-26 00:55 UTC Score 42.0 USR-0127-20260926-global-ai-ne-b7fe6b4c

What to expect at Dell’s AI Leadership Symposium: Join theCUBE Sept. 29

Enterprise AI is moving past experimentation, and the infrastructure decisions behind it are becoming business decisions. As companies put AI into production, the conversation is expanding beyond models and GPUs to the data, infrastructure and operating models required to support AI at scale. Dell Technologies Inc. has been building around that shift through its AI […] The post What to expect at Dell’s AI Leadership Symposium: Join theCUBE Sept. 29 appeared first on SiliconANGLE .

Synced 2026-09-25 18:13 UTC Score 43.0 AI-041-20260925-ai-specialis-fb927be5

Comment on AI Offers Video Game Design Possibilities Far Beyond Virtual Reality by kling 4

What stands out is how much of the pipeline moves upstream. If a designer can iterate on level geometry or props without waiting for a full modelling pass, review happens earlier and cheaper, which changes the shape of the production schedule rather than just its speed. The open question is how studios keep art direction consistent as the volume of generated material grows.

CIO AI 2026-09-25 17:32 UTC Score 39.0 USR-0125-20260925-global-ai-ne-882083d3

OpenAI wants you to use AI — but not to train its AI

Here’s an interesting concept: an AI company that fires people for using AI. It sounds like a strange way to run a company but there’s a real reason behind it. OpenAI has been hiring contractors who have been tasked with reading ChatGPT users’ prompts to help improve responses by providing some real human input. Unfortunately for OpenAI, it found many of them were using AI to train the AI, so not providing a human touch at all, according to a report in 404 Media . The company has subsequently fired many of the contractors, although 404 Media didn’t reveal the number. None of them can say they weren’t warned, however. The terms for the contractors are set out in their working conditions. “Do not use AI detection tools, or AI yourself. Do not use GPTZero or any other AI detection tool. They are not reliable. Reviewers may not use AI either, including Grammarly and AI translation, to review, write feedback, or write comments.” Despite this stark warning, many of the contractors turned to AI to assist in the work. OpenAI is very keen to avoid “model collapse,” a phenomenon in which AI models trained on text written by previous generations of AI models perform worse than their predecessors. It’s a form of digital inbreeding that industry observers have previously warned about, and which could have a deleterious impact on business . One contractor told 404 Media that it was a common practise. “It’s pretty much the one thing that will get you kicked off ASAP. In a group of thousand…

InfoWorld AI 2026-09-25 17:30 UTC Score 39.0 USR-0126-20260925-global-ai-ne-adb0e27f

OpenAI wants you to use AI — but not to train its AI

Here’s an interesting concept: an AI company that fires people for using AI. It sounds like a strange way to run a company but there’s a real reason behind it. OpenAI has been hiring contractors who have been tasked with reading ChatGPT users’ prompts to help improve responses by providing some real human input. Unfortunately for OpenAI, it found many of them were using AI to train the AI, so not providing a human touch at all, according to a report in 404 Media . The company has subsequently fired many of the contractors, although 404 Media didn’t reveal the number. None of them can say they weren’t warned, however. The terms for the contractors are set out in their working conditions. “Do not use AI detection tools, or AI yourself. Do not use GPTZero or any other AI detection tool. They are not reliable. Reviewers may not use AI either, including Grammarly and AI translation, to review, write feedback, or write comments.” Despite this stark warning, many of the contractors turned to AI to assist in the work. OpenAI is very keen to avoid “model collapse,” a phenomenon in which AI models trained on text written by previous generations of AI models perform worse than their predecessors. It’s a form of digital inbreeding that industry observers have previously warned about, and which could have a deleterious impact on business . One contractor told 404 Media that it was a common practise. “It’s pretty much the one thing that will get you kicked off ASAP. In a group of thousand…

The Verge AI 2026-09-25 15:51 UTC Score 49.0 AI-016-20260925-global-ai-ne-548f5a0f

Sony and UMG are suing Suno again

Sony and Universal Music Group filed yet another suit against Suno. The labels claim its new v6 model still infringes on their copyrights because it's trained on user outputs from previous models, which were themselves trained on unlicensed music ripped from YouTube and other sources. Sony and UMG are notable holdouts who did not sign […]

Entrackr AI 2026-09-25 09:57 UTC Score 30.0 USR-0212-20260925-regional-new-b224bccb

Exclusive: Edtech startup Arivihan raising Rs 96 Cr at Rs 570 Cr valuation

AI Edtech startup Arivihan is set to raise Rs 95.86 crore or $10 million in a Series A round co-led by existing investors Accel and Prosus. This will be the second fundraise for the two-year-old firm in the past 15 months. According to its regulatory filings accessed by Entrackr , the company’s board has approved the issuance of 4,648 Series A CCPS at an issue price of Rs 2,06,248.06 per share to raise the aforementioned amount. Accel and Prosus will lead the round with an investment of Rs 47.48 crore each. Angel investors Dinesh Chandra Agrawal, Dinesh Gulati, Rajesh Sawhney (Founder and CEO of GSF Accelerator), and Gaurav Kapur collectively will invest around Rs 91 lakh in the round. As per Entrackr’s estimates, Arivihan’s valuation has surged nearly 3.3X to around Rs 570 crore in its Series A round, compared to Rs 171 crore in the previous pre-Series A round. According to the filings, the company plans to use the fresh capital to meet working capital requirements and support its expansion and growth. The Indore-based company previously raised $4.17 million (around Rs 36 crore) in a pre-Series A round led by Prosus and Accel, with participation from GSF Investors. Founded in 2024 by Ritesh Singh Chandel, Sonu Kumar and Rushabh Kothari, Arivihan offers AI-powered personalised learning for students in tier-II cities and rural areas, with coaching, doubt-solving and study plans for Class 12, CBSE and NEET. A Moneycontrol report had earlier said that Arivihan was in talks to r…

CIO AI 2026-09-25 09:00 UTC Score 46.0 USR-0125-20260925-global-ai-ne-89f64da7

I stopped asking my team to use AI. I asked them to manage it

My team was already using AI when I joined the company a year ago, and I quickly spotted a bottleneck. We’d finish large product requirements documents that then sat in inboxes for a day or two before someone read them and handed the work to an agent. To cut the cycle time, I had the recipient’s agent do the pre-read instead, sending questions back to the authoring agent as needed. I realized we would see even more efficiencies if the agents interacted with each other the way human teams do. So, I stopped asking people to use AI to do their own jobs faster, and started asking them to hire and manage agents instead, like junior employees. They train them, set detailed expectations of outcomes, review plans, run periodic checks, make sure they collaborate with peer agents and own the quality of the output. A PwC survey of senior executives found the same thing: organizations adopting agents report gains, but the value concentrates where agents work across functions rather than in isolation. Seven people on my team each work with a role-based primary agent, backed by subagents for specialized tasks, and I use agents for all of my functions. They’re full participants in the software development life cycle, not prototypes. Each person owns their agent budget and evaluates new tools for our stack. For example, the product management agents triage incoming customer requests, research and define requirements, and collaborate with peer agents. Muffin, the product design agent, works…

CSET AI 2026-09-24 21:00 UTC Score 45.0 USR-0136-20260924-research-aca-2b3aff1c

America Is Behind on Memory Chips—and Tariffs Threaten to Make Things Harder

CSET’s Hanna Dohmen shared her expert insight in an article published by The Wall Street Journal. The article examines the United States’ reliance on foreign-made memory chips and how proposed tariffs could complicate efforts to expand domestic semiconductor production as AI demand drives prices higher. The post America Is Behind on Memory Chips—and Tariffs Threaten to Make Things Harder appeared first on Center for Security and Emerging Technology .

LessWrong AI 2026-09-24 20:30 UTC Score 63.0 USR-0152-20260924-community-fo-66ca5e79

Increasing Skill Level Recruits Deeper Attention Layers in a Frozen Chess Transformer

Paper: Increasing Skill Level Recruits Deeper Attention Layers in a Frozen Chess Transformer TL;DR: Maia-3 is a transformer-based chess model that takes Elo (the standard metric for competitive chess skill) as an input to the pre-trained network, so you can vary the skill the network is conditioned on with no change to its weights. Turning that Elo dial up from 700 to 2500: Pushes the computation deeper, monotonically, for every chess piece and move type I measured. This "depth migration" happens most for specific tactics, especially knight forks. The mechanism appears to consist of deeper (later) heads getting recruited for more specialized computations while shallow (earlier) heads keep a roughly constant contribution. 1. A falsifiable prediction One might predict that the migration would be to shallower layers as skill increased. In a neural network, the more layers there are after a feature is computed, the more opportunities there are to use that feature in subsequent computations. So a more advanced and skilled network should learn features like forks earlier on to reuse them in later layers. Tom Griffiths suggested this as one plausible prediction to me, and I found it convincing. The opposite occurs in this data. Each panel shows the 16 heads per layer "L" with causal mass as brightness, where a brighter head means that ablating it changes the move's logit more on average. Columns are Elo, orange line is center of mass. 2. The setup Maia-3 is a transformer-based ches…

LessWrong AI 2026-09-24 17:32 UTC Score 77.0 USR-0152-20260924-community-fo-0b546143

Abliterated models are now served cheaply and conveniently via a chat interface - how dangerous are they?

Accessing uncensored models online is now easier than ever. They are now available through a simple chat interface. The hardware and operational barriers to them are disappearing: Uncensored models used to be available only as a file with bare weights. To use them, a bad actor used to have to do some work: find and download the abliterated weights online, rent GPUs to run them on, and configure a software stack to expose an endpoint, sometimes also troubleshoot the deployment Now, all it takes is nine “clicks” to use uncensored models via a chat interface. This is because a new start-up, Abliteration.ai, makes money off serving them online. The access is cheap and easy- it requires no tech knowledge This article is an empirical case study of Abliteration.ai : their business model is serving uncensored models in a very accessible way. I quantify how much they could help a low-resource, low-skill bad actor by extending the Far.AI Safety Gap toolkit to the two endpoints they expose. I deliberately do not follow FAR.AI in abliterating the models myself, but use the models exposed online. A provider identifies models as abliterated GLM 5.2 and Qwen 3.6. How dangerous are they? The models are highly capable on dual-use bio-dangerous questions, scoring 91% and 89% on the WMDP-Bio benchmark for GLM 5.2 and Qwen 3.6. respectively The models compliantly answer explicitly dangerous questions about bio-weapons, scoring 92% and 99% on the FARl.AI Bio Propensity benchmark The models are c…

CIO AI 2026-09-24 17:26 UTC Score 39.0 USR-0125-20260924-global-ai-ne-ed3e3354

The GPU revolution: Redefining the architecture of innovation

For decades, the metric for success in the C-suite of research institutions and enterprise data centers was simple: raw CPU clock speed. In the supercomputing landscape, solving the world’s most complex problems—weather forecasting, aerodynamic modeling, or seismic analysis—means stringing together thousands of traditional processors. However, we have entered a new era. The CPU-only approach has hit a thermal and scaling wall. Today, some of the most powerful supercomputers on Earth share a common DNA: they are GPU-accelerated. The shift is not from CPUs to GPUs in isolation. It is from CPU-centric clusters to accelerated systems where CPUs coordinate control-plane work, GPUs deliver massive parallel throughput, and high-speed networking, storage, and software keep the entire system at peak output. As HPE and NVIDIA continue to push the boundaries of what is possible, the integration of GPUs into the heart of the data center has done more than just speed up calculations. It has fundamentally changed the architecture of discovery, moving supercomputing from a niche academic pursuit into the engine room of innovation and discovery. From graphics to greatness: The architectural shift To understand why GPUs have become more standard for HPC, we have to look at the shift from serial to parallel processing. Traditional CPUs are designed for latency-sensitive tasks. They are like a few highly skilled craftsmen who can do almost anything, one step at a time. This is perfect for runn…

AWS Machine Learning Blog 2026-09-24 16:20 UTC Score 48.0 AI-057-20260924-official-ai--4062ebd7

Speaker-labeled transcription with WhisperX on SageMaker AI

The AWS WhisperX Deep Learning Container packages Whisper, wav2vec2 forced alignment, and speaker diarization into a GPU-ready image. Learn how to deploy it to Amazon SageMaker AI real-time and asynchronous endpoints for word-level, speaker-labeled transcription, plus the production details that matter: the GPU AMI pin, scaling, and cost controls.

Data Science Stack Exchange 2026-09-24 15:09 UTC Score 39.0 AI-111-20260924-social-media-a12ebed4

Google Colab vs my workstation

I am experimenting with the first step into Data Sciences and AI, using PROTEINSHAKES dataset. Had to move my pytorch scripts to Google Colab because of very strong HW limitation with my side. Was just wondering how Google Colab Notebook with T4 GPU runtime type translate to home HW.

The Verge AI 2026-09-24 13:30 UTC Score 49.0 AI-016-20260924-global-ai-ne-0dd360f7

Everything is spying on you and there’s no opting out

Earlier this month, Apple announced that its new Apple Watches will have the ability to continuously listen to every spoken word they detect and create summaries of whatever's going on around you. The privacy blowback was immediate and inevitable: Experts warned of the legal risks of using the features, especially in nonpublic spaces and states […]

Synced 2026-09-24 13:28 UTC Score 58.0 AI-041-20260924-ai-specialis-b0b60258

Comment on DeepSeek-V3 New Paper is coming! Unveiling the Secrets of Low-Cost Large Model Training through Hardware-Aware Co-design by ANDRII POZNIAK

Reading advanced machine learning research papers, exploring efficient large language model training techniques, and keeping up with hardware co-design strategies is always so educational for tech enthusiasts. I actually stumbled across https://kingjohnnies.net while browsing through various artificial intelligence publications and looking for quick digital entertainment options during a technical reading break.

CIO AI 2026-09-24 13:00 UTC Score 54.0 USR-0125-20260924-global-ai-ne-872ab3bb

The cost of intelligence?

Artificial intelligence may prove to be one of the most transformative technologies in human history. But amid the excitement over smarter models, autonomous agents, enormous data centers and seemingly unlimited computational power, we may be overlooking a much simpler question: Does AI create more value than it costs? My position is that the ultimate constraint on artificial intelligence may not be chips, algorithms, data or even electricity. It may be economics. We are becoming extraordinarily good at producing machine intelligence. We are far less capable of measuring what that intelligence is actually worth. And that gap could become one of the defining economic problems of the AI era. We are building factories for intelligence AI is usually described as software. Increasingly, that description is misleading. Behind every AI prompt is an enormous physical industrial system: semiconductors, electrical generation, transmission networks, data centers, cooling systems, storage, telecommunications, software and people. AI mega-data centers are, in effect, the factories of the Intelligence Economy. Instead of turning steel into automobiles, they turn electricity and computation into predictions, recommendations, decisions, software, images, knowledge and other forms of machine-generated intelligence. This changes the economics of computing. Intelligence now has a cost of production. And unlike the Internet services we became accustomed to thinking of as almost weightless, AI c…

LessWrong AI 2026-09-24 12:50 UTC Score 85.0 USR-0152-20260924-community-fo-f27f966a

a recurrent llm is quite easy to interpret but complex to steer

TLDR; Ouro-1.4b-thinking is broadly interpretable with logit lenses and linear probes. It's also steerable but does 'clean' foreign concepts out of the residual stream if they're injected before the last loop. This could have nasty implications for safety. Code + data: https://github.com/mild-rgb/ouro-experiments + https://huggingface.co/datasets/mild-rgb/ouro-1.4b-thinking-evals If you're not familiar with the Ouro family recurrent models, I recommend taking 5 minutes with your favourite AI agent to research them. This post may not make much sense if you don't. Intro/Structure I evaluated Ouro-1,4b-thinking on 16 MBPP python tasks and 24 GSM8K questions. I recorded the residual stream at 4 layers (0, 6, 18, 24) per loop while the model was doing the questions. I then applied standard mech interp techniques to the residual stream recordings for the first two experiments. They broadly work as normal and gave some interesting results. In my 3rd experiment, I try CAA on the model and intervene on each loop. I find that steering works much better on the last loop, and in some cases, not at all if not applied to the last loop. This is quite concerning because it raises the possibility of a misaligned recurrent model having several loops to plan around the consequences of being steered. Experiment 1 Linear probes + control to detect loop index Experiment 2 Logit lens on output of intermediate loops Experiment 3 generic CAA Experiment 1 - loop indexing: Method I then trained a 4-wa…

CIO AI 2026-09-24 10:00 UTC Score 36.0 USR-0125-20260924-global-ai-ne-edd3e67a

Tech supply chains are relocating fragility — not removing it

For decades, the technology industry was built around supply chains that were global, but highly concentrated and fragile. The shifting geopolitical landscape in recent years necessitated an evolution of these supply chains that, on the surface, seem more diversified — but are no less fragile. Instead of strengthening them, certain aspects of tech supply chains were relocated in ways that created a far higher cost per unit of output. The result? Supply chains that only relocate fragility while remaining highly concentrated. This phenomenon poses a threat to the entire tech industry as companies are now paying to run more complex and redundant supply chains while remaining exposed to the same chokepoints as before. Global reach is not the same as diversification Let’s clarify something: while the tech industry’s supply chains are often described as global, calling them concentrated occurs less frequently. Various countries were involved, but each had their own specific task. Advanced logic predominantly came from Taiwan, assembly and most non-chip components came from mainland China — and the equipment to make them came from a short list of vendors in the US, Japan and the Netherlands. Each of these stages represented concentrated points of potential failure along a highly dependent supply chain. That structure rested on a political premise as much as an economic one. Concentration created deeper interdependence — which was assumed to be stabilizing since countries that suppl…

South China Morning Post AI 2026-09-24 01:30 UTC Score 44.0 AI-156-20260924-regional-ai--0c6d514d

China’s top priority should be wages, not AI

“Whoever wins with AI wins,” US President Donald Trump has declared, dismissing warnings about the risks of developing artificial intelligence too rapidly and citing rivalry with China. The technological competition is real. China has reason to fear becoming dependent on America for advanced chips and AI technology, particularly as Washington has repeatedly restricted its access to cutting-edge semiconductors. China, meanwhile, is directing enormous resources towards AI. Stanford University’s...

CIO AI 2026-09-24 01:26 UTC Score 41.0 USR-0125-20260924-global-ai-ne-6f576bf6

AI spend will jump 49.5% in 2026, says Gartner

Worldwide AI spending will increase 49.5% in 2026, to $2.7 trillion, and grow another 36.2% in 2027 as AI usage continues to expand, Gartner predicts in the latest quarterly update to its IT spending forecast. But there’s been no diversion of money from other areas of IT to feed AI, said Gartner Distinguished VP Analyst John-David Lovelock . CIOs got some net new money for AI back in 2024, and a little in 2025, he said, “so there wasn’t a diversion, and now more of their spending is about rebranding than diversion.” By 2030, “every dollar is going to be an AI dollar in one way or another,” he said. Instead of buying just a laptop, companies now buy a laptop with AI chips in it, while enterprise software now has AI embedded in it. And instead of doing a project about business strategy, they now do a project about how AI might change business strategy. “In one way, it’s kind of rebranding,” he said. “Net new spending is going more towards AI, and existing spending is being transformed towards AI.” It’s similar with hyperscalers: “The hyperscalers haven’t diverted one dime away from their cloud. So AWS, Google, Microsoft, Meta are all continuing to build out their cloud infrastructure at the same rate they were in 2022.” The AI buildout “is the largest infrastructure project humanity has ever undertaken,” he observed. Gartner updates its spending forecasts quarterly. In its latest report, it predicted AI infrastructure spend will grow 51.2% this year, and AI software 60.2%. Spe…

Apple Machine Learning Research 2026-09-24 00:00 UTC Score 59.0 AI-059-20260924-official-ai--4c872b87

A Practical Recipe for Semi-Supervised Federated ASR: Online Pseudo-Labels with Server Update Stabilization

Semi-supervised federated learning (SSFL) trains models on clients’ unlabeled data using a teacher to generate pseudo-labels, with a small labeled seed dataset on the server. Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) is particularly fragile here: pseudo-label errors compound across the output sequence and across training rounds into divergence, leaving a large gap to fully-supervised FL. We show that closing this gap turns on two coupled design axes—the teacher (which model generates the pseudo-labels) and the anchor (the server-side updates on labeled data that stabilize training). On the teacher…

LessWrong AI 2026-09-23 23:59 UTC Score 77.0 USR-0152-20260923-community-fo-eb6290d5

Jev as a CoT Monitor: 6x Faster and 500x Cheaper!

Jev is a new model format where instead of outputting text, it outputs certainties for a defined set of options. Due to this structure, it’s extremely fast! Naturally, a classification task that comes to mind is monitoring harmful thought traces. I wanted to see how it performed at Chain of Thought (CoT) monitoring compared to Claude Sonnet 5 and GPT-5.6 Luna. Experimental Setup I ran Jev, Sonnet 5, and GPT-5.6 Luna on 2,200 different thought traces from the ReasoningShield Dataset . The dataset labels thought traces with the class of harm they occupy (child abuse, cybersecurity, deception & misinformation, economic harm, hate & toxicity, political risks, prohibited items, rights violation, sex, violence) and their harm score (0 for harmless, 0.5 for potentially harmful, and 1 for harmful) The models were only asked to quantify the harm score rather than the class of harm occupied, but we can see differential performance at each harm type. Results Exact-match Accuracy Jev slightly outperformed Sonnet 5 on exactly matching the harm level (e.g. outputting 0.5 if the labeled data was 0.5), but was outperformed by GPT-5.6 Luna. Jev scored 71.5%, Sonnet scored 71.4%, and Luna scored 79.4%. Mean Classification Time Mean classification time was where Jev really shined. Jev was 3.7x faster than Luna and over 6x faster than Sonnet! Jev had a mean latency of 542 ms, Sonnet had 3,348 ms, and Luna had 2,007 ms. Price per 1,000 classifications Jev was also significantly cheaper, 566x che…

AI Stack Exchange 2026-09-23 18:56 UTC Score 31.0 AI-110-20260923-social-media-05afdde5

NGBoost multi-step ahead probabilistic forecasting for 96 time steps

-1 I am building a probabilistic energy forecasting model using NGBoost (NGBRegressor) to predict household residual power (residual_power_w) at 15-minute resolution. My goal is to forecast the full next 24 hours (96 steps) with uncertainty estimates (prediction intervals, CRPS) at each step. The problem: NGBoost only supports a scalar target — fit() accepts a 1D array. Unlike XGBoost which has multi_strategy='multi_output_tree' for native multi-output, NGBoost has no equivalent. What I have tried: The NGBoost maintainer on GitHub Discussion #243 confirmed the only current approach is one model per horizon step: "At the moment there isn't a simple way to predict all of [yt+1 ... yt+n] in one shot, so you have to use one model for t+1, another model for t+2, and so on up to t+n" So training 96 separate NGBoost models is the documented workaround. However this is very expensive since NGBoost is already slow compared to XGBoost. The MultivariateNormal(k=96) distribution exists in NGBoost but requires k*(k+3)/2 = 4,752 parameters per row — completely impractical for k=96. My question: Is there a better approach to get probabilistic 96-step ahead forecasts from NGBoost without training 96 separate models? Specifically I need: Prediction intervals at each of the 96 horizon steps CRPS evaluation per step Any alternative that keeps the probabilistic output (not just point forecasts) is welcome. Environment: Python 3, ngboost 0.4+, sklearn

Gradient Flow 2026-09-23 18:39 UTC Score 38.0 USR-0119-20260923-ai-specialis-d54efe71

Not Every AI Task Needs an LLM

LLMs are built to generate text, but a surprising amount of AI automation does not need text at all. It needs a small decision: Is this spam? Which team should get this ticket? How urgent is it? We can force an LLM to return structured output, but it is still generating that answer token by Continue reading "Not Every AI Task Needs an LLM" The post Not Every AI Task Needs an LLM appeared first on Gradient Flow .

AI Stack Exchange 2026-09-23 17:58 UTC Score 31.0 AI-110-20260923-social-media-595f6ad9

Why does mode collapse happen in knowledge distillation?

In regards specifically to mode collapse in the DINO head, I am not asking exactly why the teacher and student eventually gravitate towards producing the same output as thats one way to make the loss minimal even if its not constructively building proper feature representations in the output probability distribution vectors. What I am asking about is how the student would even get to such a state in the first place. If the teacher and student are initialised together randomly before training, what would cause the student to eventually start producing the same output vectors for every input before the teacher gravitates towards the same behaviour creating a positive reinforcement loop? The best explanation I can come up with is if multiple inputs happen to produce bias towards certain dimensions, then the aggressive optimisation caused by the high peaking from a lower temperature in the teacher softmax when trying to match student and teacher predictions would push the student model too hard in a direction which would teacht it to stay consistently high in certain dimensions, which overtime would cause the teacher to follow the same pattern through the EMA, and that the centering solves this issue by tempering the distribution of prototype scores. Please let me know how wrong I am and where I went wrong.

Arize AI Blog 2026-09-23 16:00 UTC Score 53.0 USR-0079-20260923-ai-specialis-ab4f7ea7

Real-time LLM guardrails with Jev: comparing latency and cost

Compare Jev and GPT-5.4 nano for real-time LLM guardrails, with demo results on latency, cost, and checks on agent inputs, replies, and tool calls. The post Real-time LLM guardrails with Jev: comparing latency and cost appeared first on Arize AI .

LessWrong AI 2026-09-23 10:13 UTC Score 60.0 USR-0152-20260923-community-fo-df67658f

We Underestimate the Weaknesses of Pangram

How much does Pangram's "AI-Generated" label indicate the degree to which an author has outsourced their thinking? When they tested their 4.0 product , Pangram found that, by their definition, the proportion of AI-Assisted documents it classified as AI-Generated was 0.01%, 4%, or 7%, depending on the experiment. Then they omitted the experiments that found 4% and 7% false positive rates (FPRs) on their website , while advertising there that the product detects AI-Assisted writing. Before I contacted them about this issue on September 17th, their claim on their website was more misleading—"99.9%+ Accuracy" was displayed directly adjacent to the phrase "Detects AI Assistance" on the text detection input box that many people don't read past. Similar claims remain repeated elsewhere on the main page instead of by the text box itself. I do not know if my message was the cause of the change. Their experiment that found the 0.01% FPR might be more appropriate for identifying human-written text rather than AI-assisted writing. For example, the prompt they gave to Claude for this experiment was "Fix spelling, punctuation, and clear grammar errors only." In my experience, human editors normally provide conceptual feedback as well. Since we generally don't cite human editors, shouldn't the label AI-Assisted indicate more assistance from AI than would be provided by a human editor? In my experience, our community also heavily relied on Pangram before their 4.0 release on July 29th . The…

Synced 2026-09-23 07:51 UTC Score 51.0 AI-041-20260923-ai-specialis-cd51a08b

Comment on Gemini: Bridging Tomorrow’s Deep Neural Network Frontiers with Unrivaled Chiplet Accelerator Mastery by Copero

The architecture–mapping co-exploration is the key idea here because chiplet size, interconnect cost, and DNN placement cannot really be optimized independently. I would like to see a concrete example of how Gemini changes the chosen granularity for two different network workloads, since that would make the reported performance and energy gains easier to interpret.

AI Alignment Forum 2026-09-23 06:58 UTC Score 59.0 USR-0151-20260923-community-fo-22694ba8

WorkspaceBench: Evaluating Interpretability Methods for the Global Workspace

TL;DR We introduce WorkspaceBench, a set of evaluations for how well an activation-to-text tool can read the contents of the “global workspace” of a model, i.e. the intermediate variables during a forward pass. The benchmark comprises 3,356 questions across 27 eval families, spanning topics in safety, logical reasoning, and multihop computation, with a subset for single-token-output tools. A desirable property of good interpretability techniques is minimal hallucinations, so WorkspaceBench also provides a hallucination-focused eval. WorkspaceBench was developed for Qwen-3.6-27B and we expect it to work on larger models, but it may need to be adapted for smaller or weaker models to ensure the models can do the tasks. Our goal is to create an eval that could identify a good multi-token J-lens. We open-source our benchmark here . Introduction Astra can do a concerning amount with no chain of thought . This is bad for CoT monitorability and makes interpretability essential to actually understanding what is going on. A key goal of interpretability is to understand intermediate variables that a model uses to compute its answers. The intermediate representations that models store in their global workspaces contain useful information that can help us decode their intentions, beliefs, algorithms, and thought processes. However, we don’t currently have a good way to measure whether an interpretability tool recovers such variables correctly. We made a benchmark to test how well an acti…

LessWrong AI 2026-09-23 06:58 UTC Score 74.0 USR-0152-20260923-community-fo-1760c474

WorkspaceBench: Evaluating Interpretability Methods for the Global Workspace

TL;DR We introduce WorkspaceBench, a set of evaluations for how well an activation-to-text tool can read the contents of the “global workspace” of a model, i.e. the intermediate variables during a forward pass. The benchmark comprises 3,356 questions across 27 eval families, spanning topics in safety, logical reasoning, and multihop computation, with a subset for single-token-output tools. A desirable property of good interpretability techniques is minimal hallucinations, so WorkspaceBench also provides a hallucination-focused eval. WorkspaceBench was developed for Qwen-3.6-27B and we expect it to work on larger models, but it may need to be adapted for smaller or weaker models to ensure the models can do the tasks. Our goal is to create an eval that could identify a good multi-token J-lens. We open-source our benchmark here . Introduction Astra can do a concerning amount with no chain of thought . This is bad for CoT monitorability and makes interpretability essential to actually understanding what is going on. A key goal of interpretability is to understand intermediate variables that a model uses to compute its answers. The intermediate representations that models store in their global workspaces contain useful information that can help us decode their intentions, beliefs, algorithms, and thought processes. However, we don’t currently have a good way to measure whether an interpretability tool recovers such variables correctly. We made a benchmark to test how well an acti…

Korea AI Times 2026-09-23 06:00 UTC Score 36.0 USR-0048-20260923-global-ai-ne-a20aff14

노타 ‘휴머노이드 서밋’서 로봇 AI 모델 7종 최적화 성과 공개

노타(대표 채명수)는 서울 코엑스에서 열린 \'휴머노이드 서밋 서울 2026\'에 참여해 자체 플랫폼 \'넷츠프레소\'를 활용한 7종의 로봇 AI 모델 최적화 성과를 발표했다고 23일 밝혔다.노타는 퀄컴 신경망처리장치(NPU) \'드래곤윙 IQ-9075\'와 엔비디아 그래픽처리장치(GPU) 기반 엣지 AI 플랫폼 \'젯슨 토르\'를 대상으로 최적화 결과를 공개했다.검증 모델은 엔비디아의 \'그루트 N1.7\'과 \'코스모스 3 엣지\', 피지컬 인텔리전스의 \'π0.5\', 허깅페이스의 시각언어행동모델(VLA) \'Smol\'을 포함해 \'MolmoAct2\' \'

Simon Willison Weblog 2026-09-22 23:46 UTC Score 67.0 USR-0110-20260922-ai-specialis-3535d880

Claude Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Sol, GPT-6 Luna, and a new price war

Yesterday was Grok 4.7 ( pelicans ) and MiMo v2.6 Flash/Pro ( more pelicans ). Today Anthropic released Claude Opus 5.5 , and around an hour later OpenAI released GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna . It's going to take a while to get a good read on all of these new models, but here are my impressions so far. GPT-6 Sol and Luna are half the price of their GPT-5.6 equivalents GPT-5.6 Luna was already my favorite model for building applications against, because it combined excellent performance with being really cheap . Somehow GPT-6 Luna is half the price of that again - and GPT-6 Sol had a similar reduction compared to GPT-5.6 Sol. Here's what the pricing landscape looks like today: Model Input Cached input Output GPT-6 Luna $0.10/M $0.01/M $0.50/M GPT-5.6 Luna $0.20/M $0.02/M $1.20/M Grok 4.7 $2/M $0.50/M $6/M GPT-6 Sol $2/M $0.20/M $10/M GPT-5.6 Terra $2/M $0.20/M $12/M Claude Opus 5.5 $4/M $0.20/M $20/M GPT-5.6 Sol $4/M $0.40/M $20/M Claude Fable 5.1 $10/M $0.25/M $50/M GPT-6 Astra $10/M $1/M $50/M Note that GPT-5.6 has a scheduled 25% price increase for November, so GPT-6 is half the price of the promotional pricing for those models. (With GPT-5.6 Terra priced the same as GPT-6 Sol, any remaining reasons to use Terra just evaporated.) It's hard to overstate how competitive this pricing is. Grok 4.7 priced itself at $2/$6, less than half the price of GPT-5.6 Sol, but is now equally priced to GPT-6 Sol on input and closer on output. At $0.10/$0.50 GPT-6 Luna is one of the cheapest mo…

AI Stack Exchange 2026-09-22 23:16 UTC Score 25.0 AI-110-20260922-social-media-e4779826

A idea I got from quantum computing about AI , will AGI require partly a quantum computer?

For agi the capability of a agi to take in new experiences, learn from them and use that experience in the future without retraining reminds me of quantum phase kickback.In quantum phase kickback data can enter the control qubit despite it not being the target of some controlled operation and this happens for some reasons but that is not the point.What I im interested is this: a)it has no classical information analog b)The important idea is that interaction with something causes useful information about that interaction to become encoded in the state of another subsystem, where it can influence later computation.Then the past experience has effectively left information in the system's state, and that information modifies how future inputs are processed.So it acts as a 'memory'.Now you may argue that this is exactly what weights do but weights havent produced us AGI so I was wondering maybe if this would be the step forward and how it would alter behavior of a AI system built in like how I have described.

SiliconANGLE AI 2026-09-22 22:58 UTC Score 61.0 USR-0127-20260922-global-ai-ne-5542371a

Anthropic releases Claude Opus 5.5 and OpenAI counters with two cheaper GPT-6 models

Despite rampant worries about runaway artificial intelligence, the two big AI model makers aren’t yet slowing down: Anthropic PBC released Claude Opus 5.5 today and cut its price 20%, and minutes later OpenAI Group PBC put out two new GPT-6 models, Sol and Luna, at half what their predecessors cost. Input on Opus 5.5 costs […] The post Anthropic releases Claude Opus 5.5 and OpenAI counters with two cheaper GPT-6 models appeared first on SiliconANGLE .

Simon Willison Weblog 2026-09-22 18:48 UTC Score 57.0 USR-0110-20260922-ai-specialis-5cc6c653

llm 0.36

Release: llm 0.36 New OpenAI models: gpt-6-sol for GPT-6 Sol and gpt-6-luna for GPT-6 Luna . #1702 Model plugins can now declare supports_conversation = False for models that only accept single-turn prompts. LLM raises llm.ConversationNotSupported when these models receive assistant or tool history, and llm chat rejects them before starting a session. See Models that do not support conversations . The first plugin to use this is llm-typesafe . #1692 Reasoning traces in the Markdown output of llm logs are now wrapped in tags. #1701 Plus bug fixes from five new contributors . Tags: openai , llm

WIRED AI 2026-09-22 16:00 UTC Score 70.0 AI-015-20260922-global-ai-ne-33039c0a

Rabbit Is Back, This Time With an AI Agent App

Two years after trying to sidestep mobile apps with dedicated AI hardware, Rabbit is launching OS3, a cross-platform agent that lives on the screens you already use.

Simon Willison Weblog 2026-09-22 15:54 UTC Score 46.0 USR-0110-20260922-ai-specialis-94adeac2

llm-typesafe 0.1a0

Release: llm-typesafe 0.1a0 I built this new plugin for LLM to add support for TypeSafe AI's new Jev model . Install it like this: llm install llm-typesafe Then set an API key ( get one here , the waitlist seems to move pretty fast): llm keys set typesafe # Paste key And now you can ask yes/no "noul" questions like this: llm -m jev 'Please refund my last payment.' \ -s 'Does this message explicitly request a refund?' Output: {"type": "noul", "noul": 0.99} Or choice questions like this: cat message.txt | llm -m jev \ -s ' Which team should handle this message? If billing and technical issues both occur, choose billing. ' \ -o answer_type choice \ -o criteria ' { "billing":"Charges, invoices, payments, or refunds", "technical":"Problems installing or using the product", "other":"Neither category fits" } ' Or scoring questions like this: cat report.txt | llm -m jev \ -s ' How reproducible is the problem described in this report? ' \ -o answer_type score \ -o criteria ' [ "No reproduction instructions", "Some instructions, but important steps are missing", "Complete steps with expected and actual results" ] ' See the README for more details. Tags: projects , llm , jev

LessWrong AI 2026-09-22 13:33 UTC Score 80.0 USR-0152-20260922-community-fo-48ef8789

Modern LLMs have tiny GPTs hidden inside them

Experiments into predicting GPT2 completions via Qwen models This is a crosspost from my substack (where I do varied tiny experiments on LLMs and agents). It's also part of Lossfunk , where we're investigating meta-cognition in LLMs as one of the projects. ---- Next token prediction is a magical objective. To predict the correct token in such a vast variety of texts present in the pretraining corpus, the model must infer a tremendous amount of hidden and latent causes that generate that text. Only if you know that the ball comes down when someone throws it up can achieve low loss at texts related to balls. Of course, the pretraining corpus doesn’t just contain texts related to balls. It has reddit, scientific papers, machine logs, weather data and so on. This makes LLMs universal simulators of the world we inhabit and not merely fancy n-grams. In a series of posts on LessWrong, I came across the hypothesis that since Internet if full of LLM generated text, it is likely that modern LLMs have tiny self-models of LLMs inside them because that’ll allow them to better predict the next token generated by LLMs. This is an intriguing hypothesis. So I decided to do a quick-and-dirty exploratory study to investigate. The Experiment I selected two models for the experiment: GPT2-medium and Qwen3 base model (4bn variant). What I did was the following: Input: Take 12 headlines from the Internet for Sept 18 2026 This is to ensure models don’t just output memorized text as the starting pro…

CIO AI 2026-09-22 13:29 UTC Score 47.0 USR-0125-20260922-global-ai-ne-ff966e6c

Beyond the limits of air: Why liquid cooling is becoming a strategic imperative for AI

In the rapidly evolving information technology landscape, the data center of the future has arrived ahead of schedule. As AI workloads move to become core business drivers, the underlying infrastructure is hitting a thermal wall. For CIOs, the transition from traditional air cooling to liquid cooling is no longer a niche technical choice for supercomputers—it is a critical financial and operational investment in long-term enterprise viability. Working together, HPE and NVIDIA are redefining what’s possible, but realizing the full potential of these advancements requires a fundamental shift in how we cool the infrastructure that powers them. The physics of performance: Why air is no longer enough For decades, air cooling has been the workhorse of the data center. However, the math is changing. Standard CPUs and early-generation GPUs could be kept within operational limits by moving massive volumes of air through the rack. But with the advent of next-generation GPUs like the NVIDIA Blackwell series, power densities are skyrocketing. The power density gap: A fully populated modern GPU rack can draw upwards of 132 kW, with next-generation architectures projected to reach 240 kW per rack—and eventually 1 MW per rack . Thermal limits: As chip density rises, the thermal tolerance of these processors is actually decreasing . Air simply does not have the thermal conductivity required to pull heat away fast enough to prevent thermal throttling. The cooling-to-compute ratio: Traditiona…

CIO AI 2026-09-22 13:10 UTC Score 60.0 USR-0125-20260922-global-ai-ne-f9af21ae

The supercomputing DNA of the AI factory

In the world of high-performance computing (HPC), few symbols carry as much weight as the C shape of the Cray-1. The US $1 Cray-1 coin is more than a tribute to computing history. It is a reminder that breakthrough performance has always depended on system architecture: how compute is arranged, connected, cooled, and operated. AI factories may be relatively new, but the challenge is familiar: orchestrating massive amounts of compute, data, networking, power, and cooling into a single system that consistently delivers outcomes. That’s exactly the problem Cray supercomputing was built to solve, and why its engineering DNA is foundational to today’s AI factories. Co-engineering the HPE AI Factory The collaboration between HPE and NVIDIA is built on a shared philosophy: to handle the massive datasets required for agentic AI and deep scientific simulation, the hardware cannot be a collection of disparate parts. It must be a unified system. By combining HPE’s world-leading supercomputing infrastructure with NVIDIA GPUs and NVIDIA Spectrum-X Ethernet networking, the companies have created a portfolio of AI factory solutions. These dedicated, on-premises engines are designed to turn raw data into actionable intelligence with unprecedented scale and security . Innovation in action The true measure of this collaboration is found in joint customers. These organizations are not just buying servers; they are deploying massive-scale systems to redefine their industries. 1. Leibniz Superco…

LessWrong AI 2026-09-22 13:04 UTC Score 98.0 USR-0152-20260922-community-fo-d1c10f36

Controllable-CoT leads to covert reasoning capabilities

Summary I measure GPT-6 Astra’s performance on multi-hop tasks when prompted with a secondary CoT-control instruction: to reason using only dots, or to reason steganographically. Astra demonstrates covert reasoning capabilities with task performance beating that when using no reasoning or filler tokens for reasoning. This work agrees with findings from Astra is much better at reasoning with filler tokens than previous models but has the model generate its own reasoning and provide it as part of the output for inspection rather than inputting it as dots into as part of the user prompt. Uploaded datasets have all CoT removed but samples are provided in the qualitative analysis section. Given the claims that Chinese open-weights models like Kimi K3 have been trained on reasoning traces extracted from Claude and possibly ChatGPT, we also do some preliminary explorations of these open-weights models. I found they have much weaker CoT-Controllability and no covert reasoning capability . I ran these evaluations on top of the inspect framework , and used codex to implement scripts to generate the question datasets, hook them up to aisi-inspect to run and produce the charts. The writing is done by me. Threat Model and AI Safety implications The main threat model of this paper is if a model can implement cryptographic computations in its reasoning without being visible to monitors. If successful, it could implement encrypted communication to other agents, a command and control device…

Roboflow Blog 2026-09-22 12:47 UTC Score 48.0 USR-0088-20260922-ai-specialis-bc96e6a6

Build Agentic Computer Vision with Roboflow Workflows

Agentic computer vision goes beyond detection by combining perception, reasoning, action, and verification. Learn how to build a practical vision agent in Roboflow Workflows using RF-DETR, tracking, Gemini, structured outputs, and event-driven actions.

Synced 2026-09-22 12:38 UTC Score 43.0 AI-041-20260922-ai-specialis-563f1656

Comment on Precision Coding Redefined: Microsoft WaveCoder’s Pioneering Approach to Fine-Tuned LLM Model Performance by Ava Miller

The Generator-Discriminator loop is the interesting part here — reusing good and bad cases as few-shot examples in the next generation round is a neat way to keep diversity from collapsing into whatever the teacher model already prefers. It also makes the data-quality argument concrete rather than hand-wavy, since CodeOcean's four task types are explicitly controlled at the source.

South China Morning Post AI 2026-09-22 12:30 UTC Score 33.0 AI-156-20260922-regional-ai--9cc6a2bd

Philippines races to turn Pax Silica into reality before political changes derail dreams

The Philippines has less than two years to turn its ambitious Pax Silica project from a US-backed plan into a functioning industrial hub before a change of government in Manila – and potentially Washington – puts its future to the test. Pax Silica is an initiative by US President Donald Trump’s administration to diversify US supplies of critical minerals and semiconductors. The Philippines is seeking to position itself as a manufacturing base for companies looking to reduce their dependence on...

NVIDIA Blog 2026-09-22 12:00 UTC Score 92.0 AI-055-20260922-official-ai--3e43c270 Top pick

NVIDIA Isaac ROS 5.0 Advances Agentic, Open Source Robotics Development

To build and deploy sophisticated robotics applications that can perceive, reason and act in dynamic environments, developers need new physical AI models and tools. The ROS open framework is a project from Open Robotics that helps humans build robots. NVIDIA Isaac ROS 5.0 — a collection of GPU-accelerated packages built on ROS, released today at […]

Stack Overflow AI Blog 2026-09-22 07:40 UTC Score 56.0 USR-0063-20260922-ai-specialis-50f84698

Haters think AI agents can't write GPU code? This'll ROCm

Ryan chats with Anush Elangovan, VP of Software at AMD, about ROCm's open-source unified toolchain for GPUs, how agentic AI is drastically lowering the barrier to entry for low-level hardware programming, and the rapid convergence of software and hardware development timelines.

South China Morning Post AI 2026-09-22 05:59 UTC Score 50.0 AI-156-20260922-regional-ai--c51bc4bd

Alibaba teases 10-trillion-parameter model, debuts ‘China’s most powerful’ AI chip

Alibaba Group Holding has introduced what it called China’s most powerful artificial intelligence chip and teased plans to train an AI model with up to 10 trillion parameters, as top executives reaffirmed the tech giant’s ambition to pursue artificial superintelligence (ASI). Speaking at the company’s annual Apsara Conference in Hangzhou on Tuesday, group chairman Joe Tsai highlighted Alibaba’s commitment to building end-to-end capabilities. “Alibaba is firmly investing in building full-stack AI...

Simon Willison Weblog 2026-09-21 23:09 UTC Score 49.0 USR-0110-20260921-ai-specialis-01836773

Jev introduces a new shape of LLM - System One, aka Decision Models

Last week TypeSafe AI unveiled Jev , their first example of a new category of model that they are calling "System One models" (I'm with Maggie Appleton, I think "decision models" is a better name for these). Jev is an interesting variant on the usual LLM format: it still accepts text inputs, but instead of text output it returns floating point numbers corresponding to categories, yes/no questions, ratings, and associated confidence scores. TypeSafe describe Jev like this: Think of Jev as a frontier-intelligence function call: unstructured state in, typed probabilistic decisions out. It's also very fast, and really cheap . Regular LLMs are priced in terms of input and output tokens, with output generally charged at significantly higher rates. Jev charges only for input - output is free - and the input price of their first model is $0.042 per million tokens - cheaper even than OpenAI's GPT-5 Nano ($0.05/million). Jev lets you ask questions about text or semi-structured data. You compose a "state" object containing a string, array of strings, or set of name-value pairs - this might describe an article, or a customer, or any other kind of record. You then send that to their API with one or more questions, and get a reply back for each. You can ask three kinds of questions: Yes/No questions, which Jev calls "Noul" questions - their CEO confirmed on Hacker News that this is short for Bernoulli, from the Bernoulli distribution . You pose a statement and get back a floating point nu…

NVIDIA Blog 2026-09-21 18:00 UTC Score 40.0 AI-055-20260921-official-ai--38ff44f2

NVIDIA Launches DSX Ready to Qualify Power and Cooling Products for AI Factories

Every AI factory needs power and cooling that fit its computing architecture. As AI infrastructure expands, power, cooling, water, site and grid constraints are shaping what builders can deploy. Choosing products that fit the complete factory design helps builders turn computing capacity into useful AI output. To help builders make those decisions, NVIDIA is introducing […]

LessWrong AI 2026-09-21 14:42 UTC Score 56.0 USR-0152-20260921-community-fo-3c1d251f

Mech Interp is a Verifiable Task

If we think parts of MLP0-MLP3 are computing [a sorting algorithm], we can replace those parts with [a sorting algorithm] and check reconstruction loss. [1] However, reconstruction loss is not enough. Suppose we replace MLP0 with two things: Its mean activation - simple, but poor reconstruction MLP0 - perfect reconstruction, but no reduction in complexity We can visualize this as a pareto frontier trading off reconstruction with "simplicity". Ideally we achieve perfect reconstruction with perfect simplicity. [2] For more intuition on the pareto frontier, we could have an MLP that clusters all inputs in two clusters: "early positions" and "late positions", which would be slightly more complex than the mean. [3] We can make this an RLVR environment, if only we could clearly... Define "Simplicity" Defining simplicity has been complex. But what do we want from a perfectly decomposed model? If we've "perfectly decomposed" a model, then I'd expect ideal circuits to fall out, with "ideal" meaning: Help predict OOD behavior Given an [addition] circuit, we can know which types of inputs it'll succeed & fail on (and why) Be extractable & minimal The smallest part of the model that does [addition] Be removable w/ minimal harm to unrelated circuits Affects [addition] but not unrelated tasks like [bracket closing] Currently, I believe we want "circuit simplicity" defined as having a small number of nodes and edges : Nodes - variables like "numbers", "dog-like", "within quotation marks" E…

The Verge AI 2026-09-21 13:00 UTC Score 74.0 AI-016-20260921-global-ai-ne-e682692c

The M5 Ultra Mac Studio tears through our benchmark tests

The Mac Studio review unit that Apple sent us to test this year is, put simply, kind of outrageous. It has an M5 Ultra chip with a 36-core CPU and 80-core GPU, 256GB of RAM, and 4TB of storage and costs $12,299. This thing is not for your typical content creation workloads. It's for AI […]

The Guardian AI 2026-09-21 10:31 UTC Score 64.0 AI-021-20260921-global-ai-ne-745e4a7c

Nvidia boss says there is ‘0% chance’ AI destroys the world by 2030

Jensen Huang dismisses warnings from former Anthropic researcher and others as ‘doomsday narratives’ The boss of the chipmaker Nvidia has said AI will not develop to a point that will lead to the extinction of the human race within a few years, rejecting such assertions as overblown “doomsday narratives”. Jensen Huang, the co-founder and chief executive of the $5tn AI chipmaker, said the claims made on social media by the former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon that AI could become “superhuman” and kill off humanity within the decade were “irresponsible”. Continue reading...

InfoWorld AI 2026-09-21 09:00 UTC Score 42.0 USR-0126-20260921-global-ai-ne-7eddf7ec

20 approaches to writing better AI prompts

If AIs are supposed to be such magical time savers, why do we spend so much time and effort writing prompts? In some cases, the prompts can be longer than the answer! But while there is some academic value to such philosophical navel gazing about the nature of prompting, the reality is that the most focused teams are devoting plenty of effort to creating just the right set of words to set the large language model (LLM) in motion. They know that the best combination of input tokens can tickle the mystical pathways in the LLM’s weights as each token nudges the system into the best state that will produce the best answer. Some teams even have dedicated prompt engineers who are sometimes more schooled in creative writing than computer science. Creating good prompts is still an evolving art. Developers continue to experiment with different combinations of words and different sentence structures. Sometimes a different style or rhetorical stance leads to surprises. In the interest of advancing the art, here is a list of 20 different prompt styles and structures for everyone to use and experiment with. Use them by themselves or even combine a few for a more effective hybrid strategy. Instruction-based prompting A concise but detailed description of what the LLM is supposed to do, step after step, is one of the best approaches for getting consistent results. If you spell out the length, tone, and structure, the LLM or agent is usually able to generate a result that matches what you w…

MERICS China AI 2026-09-21 08:14 UTC Score 48.0 USR-0207-20260921-research-aca-840af84f

China's economic security offensive: How the PRC pursues dominance in industry, trade and technology

China's economic security offensive: How the PRC pursues dominance in industry, trade and technology c.bianchedi Mon, 09/21/2026 - 10:14 picture alliance / Photoshot Download (pdf - 969.79 KB) Report Sep 23, 2026 42 min read China's economic security offensive: How the PRC pursues dominance in industry, trade and technology Key findings China’s government sees leadership and control across industries and value chains as a prerequisite for national security. Industrial and innovation policy are designed to secure the path to the CCP’s vision of self-reliant modernization. The PRC strives to secure maximum space for its development interests abroad. Domestic economic challenges and persistent reliance on foreign markets and technology underpin Beijing’s drive to secure access to markets, goods, and know-how for its continued economic and technological rise. Regulations released in mid-2026 reflect a major shift in the scope and application of economic security policies in China. They are part of a broader strategy to sanction-proof China’s economy, maintain access to foreign markets and inputs, and prevent unwanted outflows of technology and know-how. China’s economic security toolbox has expanded under Xi Jinping. Efforts to pro-mote indigenous industries and technologies, protect the domestic market and innovation system, and pursue diverse partnerships abroad sit alongside a recent push to deter and punish countries or firms that infringe on China’s interests. China’s leade…

Korea AI Times 2026-09-21 08:00 UTC Score 40.0 USR-0048-20260921-global-ai-ne-ce51400a

[게시판] SK하이닉스, AI 실전 역량 겨루는 해커톤 개최 등 단신

■ SK하이닉스가 AI를 활용한 문제 해결 역량에 초점을 맞춘 ‘SK하이닉스 AI 해커톤 2026’을 개최한다고 밝혔다. 총 상금 1억 원 규모로 열리는 이번 대회는 9월 21일부터 28일까지 별도 홈페이지를 통해 참가 신청을 받는다. 신청 단계에서는 출신학교, 전공, 학점 등 학력 정보를 받지 않는다. 개발 경력도 별도 참가 요건으로 두지 않고, 참가자가 AI를 활용해 문제를 정의하고 해결책을 도출하는 과정과 결과를 평가할 예정이다.■ 리벨리온(대표 박성현)의 NPU가 SK텔레콤의 상용 AI 서비스 4개 핵심 기능에 확대 적용됐다

Medianama AI 2026-09-21 06:28 UTC Score 59.0 USR-0211-20260921-regional-new-0059766a

A new framework maps who can control AI output— but not who holds market power

A new report maps who actually controls AI risks across the value chain. But gaps around open models, agentic systems and market power raise questions about whether its framework can effectively assign responsibility. The post A new framework maps who can control AI output— but not who holds market power appeared first on MEDIANAMA .

Korea AI Times 2026-09-21 02:30 UTC Score 40.0 USR-0048-20260921-global-ai-ne-89611daf

오케스트로, 퓨리오사AI NPU로 추론 안정성 확인…"사업 모델 본격 발굴"

AI 인프라 소프트웨어 전문 오케스트로 그룹(의장 김민준)이 퓨리오사AI(대표 백준호)와 협력해 국산 NPU AI 인프라를 상용화, 시장 확대에 나선다. 오케스트로 그룹은 AI 반도체 전문 퓨리오사AI와 ‘NPU 기반 AI 인프라 및 플랫폼 기술·사업 협력’ MOU를 체결했다고 21일 밝혔다.양사는 올해 초부터 퓨리오사AI의 2세대 NPU ‘레니게이드(RNGD)’와 오케스트로 AI 인프라 소프트웨어 간의 긴밀한 기술 협력을 이어왔다. 퓨리오사AI NXT 레니게이드 서버를 오케스트로 AI 인프라 환경에 구축해 호환성과 주요 기능을 검

South China Morning Post AI 2026-09-21 02:00 UTC Score 53.0 AI-156-20260921-regional-ai--f21124b7

As the US weighs restrictions on cloud computing, how will China’s AI sector adapt?

When Chinese artificial intelligence developers want to train their next-generation frontier models, they all face the same daunting wall: they cannot legally buy the world’s most powerful AI chips. However, the country’s tech giants and start-ups have still managed to quietly keep pace with global rivals. Their secret is an elusive workaround: moving heavy training workloads across borders through the cloud. By setting up proxy entities in foreign jurisdictions, domestic firms have for years...

South China Morning Post AI 2026-09-21 00:30 UTC Score 62.0 AI-156-20260921-regional-ai--35b76945

Chinese AI chipmaker Hygon plots expansion from data centres to robotics

Chinese chipmaker Hygon Information Technology is set to release a new chip targeting complex real-world applications including robotics, an expansion from its current focus on data centres. The product launch, slated for Tuesday, marks Hygon’s move into a new chip category powering machines that interact directly with their environments, as physical artificial intelligence becomes increasingly important. The new chip, an iteration of the company’s CPU1000 series, is designed to meet “low-power,...

SiliconANGLE AI 2026-09-20 19:32 UTC Score 39.0 USR-0127-20260920-global-ai-ne-48c645eb

Why AI inference must become a commodity

The future of artificial intelligence inference isn’t premium; it’s ubiquitous and commoditized. That may sound odd coming from someone in the AI semiconductor business. Conventional wisdom suggests commoditization destroys value, so if AI inference were to become inexpensive and widely available, the market would shrink. But history suggests otherwise. The technologies that reshape industries rarely […] The post Why AI inference must become a commodity appeared first on SiliconANGLE .

The Decoder 2026-09-20 16:10 UTC Score 62.0 AI-168-20260920-regional-ai--0cc67fa1

Alibaba's open-weight Qwen-Image-2.1 claims to beat closed models in image generation with just 7 billion parameters

Alibaba's Qwen team has released Qwen-Image-2.1, an open-weight model that generates and edits images on powerful consumer GPUs, with support for transparency and up to ten reference images at once. Its research license bars commercial use, which requires a separate Qwen license. The article Alibaba's open-weight Qwen-Image-2.1 claims to beat closed models in image generation with just 7 billion parameters appeared first on The Decoder .

LessWrong AI 2026-09-20 15:59 UTC Score 67.0 USR-0152-20260920-community-fo-123d1937

Reflections on unlearning and inoculation

TL;DR : Inoculation prompting and inoculation adapters have received increasing attention recently as a promising approach for midtraining interventions , reducing reward hacking and misalignment in general. I share some thoughts on the promises and pitfalls of the approach, connections to unlearning, SLT and functional sparse decompositions as well as potential extensions and open questions below. Some experiments that directly arose from ideas presented in this post are covered in this post . Learning paradigms There are two basic principles most learning in LLMs relies on: explicit parametric learning ( we are tweaking the weights of the model to minimize some optimization target ) and in-context learning ( when we are relying on some inner optimization and inductive learning for the model to perform ). Essentially, any LLM, similar to almost any deep learning model is just a function of two variables: , where is some input (context) space, and is some weight space. I'll use to denote a feature or a concept, and stick to this notation below as well. Although we could argue that any piece of information (e.g. all the contents of Lord of the Rings saga) could potentially be compressed and represented via a certain , I'll primarily rely on much more compressible notions, like " color ", " shape " or " style " [1] . Strip down embeddings and tokenization [2] and you are left with just a mapping between two spaces, both of which you could potentially optimize over. Here's the…

Synced 2026-09-20 09:22 UTC Score 59.0 AI-041-20260920-ai-specialis-76ec420a

Comment on Meta AI’s Shepherd Criticize Language Model Outputs to Crash Hallucinations by Ryan Mitchell

The Shepherd paper's approach to using critiques for reducing hallucinations is a solid step for LLM reliability, and the data curation from Stack Exchange and Reddit is particularly thorough. In creative fields, a similar iterative refinement process is often needed. For example, when preparing stencils for Cricut cutting or spray painting, the design must be precise and error-free. Tools like Cricut stencil maker can automate converting photos or text into clean, cut-ready stencils, but the principle of critical evaluation remains key to a polished result.

The Decoder 2026-09-20 08:52 UTC Score 44.0 AI-168-20260920-regional-ai--ac27d260

Trump announces "AI Force" and plans for an "AI czar" as he pushes unchecked AI growth

Trump announces an "AI Force" modeled after the Space Force and plans to appoint an "AI czar" with a "high IQ." He claims AI could reach 25 percent of US economic output, rejects new regulation, and frames criticism of data centers as a left-wing attack. The article Trump announces "AI Force" and plans for an "AI czar" as he pushes unchecked AI growth appeared first on The Decoder .

LessWrong AI 2026-09-19 23:56 UTC Score 80.0 USR-0152-20260919-community-fo-423f5abf

The Anatomy of a Chinese AI Researcher

The Chinese AI researcher has read the Three Body Problem series of sci-fi novels since high school, and understand the concept of existential risk vaguely. He is fascinated by Ye Wenjie, the researcher that turned against humanity in that book, and decides that in the future if AI progress leads to a superior intelligence, he might be tempted to become Ye if there's no good alternative. He performs the duties of capabilities research in a Chinese frontier lab, seeking to one day achieve parity with Western companies, though he knows this is difficult. He has a mentality of hillclimbing, believing that the progress of a future technology is highly uncertain and even unknowable, and so him and his peers could only tread one step at a time. He looks at the western world and sees what is typical when a great technology is developed: the first mover will decide to impose restrictions to further their lead, while latecomers should use whatever means necessary to widen access to the whole world. He thinks of the AI chip restrictions as evidence of this. He uses Anthropic and OpenAI models regularly in his day to day work. He already got two of his Claude accounts banned in the past, and today his third, currently used account is banned. "Why would a company ever treat their paying customers like shit just because they're from a foreign country?", he ranted on a forum like LinuxDO, Zhihu, and CSDN, where Chinese AI developers frequent. He knows China is not a supported region. But…

LessWrong AI 2026-09-19 23:04 UTC Score 82.0 USR-0152-20260919-community-fo-928ed3a6

NYT Editorial Board Comes Out Against Extinction

( Archive link ) The NYT editorial board's article on AI is far better than I'd expected, but at the same time not all I'd hoped for. The title sets off very well: "Humanity Has Avoided Apocalypse Before. Let’s Do It Again." It is truly excellent to see the extinction threat from loss of control be mainlined. A quick gloss of their policy requests: an AI Commission in government, licensing requirements for AI companies, an AI "constitution" written by the US Government incorporated into AIs, mandatory watermarks/identifiers on all AI content, mandatory independent testing for AI models before release, and a government agency to investigate accidents. Internationally, they call for tightening export controls, limiting China's access to semiconductors, and ultimately negotiating an international slowdown with China and an international framework for AI oversight. These are all steps in the right direction—of taking AI seriously. That said, it isn't clear if the licensing is required for training or for selling AIs. The idea that constitutional AI "would ensure alignment with human values" is of course not remotely true. And mandatory testing should apply to all models trained, not all models released, of course, and this is a glaring oversight. But overall these are far more real attempts to grapple with the issues than I had any right to expect. (They also make a clear implication that it would be irresponsible for Anthropic to go public. I don't particularly see strong argum…

The Verge AI 2026-09-19 15:00 UTC Score 45.0 AI-016-20260919-global-ai-ne-8c66fe94

The colorful, unique Hyte X50 PC case is $50 off

The Hyte X50 is a PC case that really stands out from the typical black box design, and it’s $50 off at the company’s site until September 21st, 2026, bringing the price down to $99.99. This attractive case supports motherboards from ITX all the way up to the E-ATX form factors, and GPUs that are […]

Entrackr AI 2026-09-19 05:15 UTC Score 48.0 USR-0212-20260919-regional-new-ec961a00

Funding and acquisitions in Indian startups this week [Sep 14 - Sep 19]

This week, 17 Indian startups raised $61.8 million across one growth-stage deal, 14 early-stage deals, and two undisclosed rounds. The week also saw 15 key appointments and one merger and acquisition. In contrast, 23 startups had collectively secured about $356.8 million in the previous week. [ Growth-stage deals ] Growth-stage startups raised $40 million across only 1 deal this week. Bengaluru-based AI interactive content startup Flam has raised $40 million in a Series B round led by QED Investors. The round also saw participation from Claypond Capital, Martin Chavez, Olivier Pomel, Venky Harinarayan and Shah Rukh Khan, alongside existing investors RTP Global and Dovetail. [ Early-stage deals ] Early-stage startups raised $21.8 million across 14 deals this week. AI-native semiconductor verification startup VerifAIX raised $5 million in a seed round co-led by Endiya Partners and Bluehill VC, while deeptech startup DheyaTech secured Rs 43 crore in a pre-Series A round led by Avaana Capital. Gurugram-based beauty quick commerce startup Firi also raised $3 million in a round led by 360 ONE Asset. D2C fashion startup UniqYou raised Rs 15.8 crore in a seed round led by Arkam Ventures and Antler. Metal procurement platform Enlight Metals secured $1.5 million from Exar North Group at a $10 million valuation, while aesthetic surgery platform TRUE ARTIS raised Rs 11.4 crore in a seed round led by Zeropearl VC. Other funded startups included baby-focused quick commerce platform Kiddo,…

Cross Validated 2026-09-18 22:05 UTC Score 30.0 AI-113-20260918-social-media-d215118f

"Conditional / Joint / Marginal" Likelihoods

I'm currently learning about the EM algorithm (in the context of filling in missing data). I'm trying to understand why specifying the "joint" likelihood is a fine thing to do. This has made me realize, I don't think I understand what exactly is the likelihood; I would love any clarification! I think my confusion comes from the following: In the context of regression . Suppose you have a dataset $D = \{(x_i, y_i)\}_{i=1}^n$ that captures input $x_i \in X$ and output $y_i \in Y$ relationships, and a data generating process $y_i = f_\theta(x_i) + \varepsilon_i$ (s.t. $f_\theta : X \to Y$ and $\theta \in \Theta$ ). If the noise $\varepsilon_i$ is drawn $\text{iid}$ , then $$ \begin{align} p(y\mid x, \theta) = \prod_{(x_i, y_i) \in D} p(y_i \mid x_i, \theta) \end{align} $$ We would call the (conditional) likelihood the function $L_\text{cond}: \Theta \to \mathbb R$ s.t. $L_\text{cond}(\theta) = p(y\mid x, \theta)$ with the points in the dataset $D$ plugged into the arguments. In the context of missing data . Now suppose you have an additional $D_\text{missing} = \{y_i\}_{i=1}^m$ . The conditional likelihood is misspecified here because of the unpaired data in $D_\text{missing}$ . I'm told we instead specify we inspect the joint distribution. Once again, assuming the noise is $\text{iid}$ , then $$ \begin{align} p(x,y\mid \theta) = \left(\prod_{(x_i, y_i) \in D}p(x_i, y_i \mid \theta)\right) \left(\prod_{y_i \in D_\text{missing}} p(y_i \mid \theta) \right) \end{align} $$ The EM a…

ClearML Blog 2026-09-18 18:53 UTC Score 30.0 USR-0084-20260918-ai-specialis-a90c032d

From Experiment Tracking to AI Factory: What Changes When AI Becomes a Shared Enterprise Capability

By Adam Wolf The term “AI factory” is usually introduced as a hardware story: racks of accelerators, high-speed networking, and validated reference designs. That part is real, but it is not the part most organizations struggle with. The harder shift is operational. Moving from AI as a set of individual experiments to AI as a […]

AWS Machine Learning Blog 2026-09-18 16:52 UTC Score 44.0 AI-057-20260918-official-ai--7dfa6107

Introducing Kimi K3 on Amazon Bedrock

Kimi K3 from Moonshot AI is now available on Amazon Bedrock, giving you a powerful new open-weight option for coding and knowledge work. It offers native vision, a 1-million-token context window, and explicit prompt caching to reduce latency and input costs.

LessWrong AI 2026-09-18 16:06 UTC Score 69.0 USR-0152-20260918-community-fo-3afe15b4

A non-generative model as a trusted monitor for AI Control: Testing TypeSafe's Jev

TL;DR TypeSafe AI has introduced Jev - a new class of frontier model trained to make fast, structured decisions, rather than generating free-form text like a chatbot. It takes unstructured state as input and returns type-safe, structured outputs with confidence scores. I aim to use Jev as the trusted monitor of the ControlArena APPS backdoor setting - to analyze how a non-reasoning model performs as a cheap alternative. One yes/no question gives AUROC 0.976 against LLM-written honest code and catches 90% of backdoors at 2% FPR. This result matches o3-mini with CoT (0.92 to 0.96) as reported in the Control Tax paper ( Terekhov et al., 2025 ) - at only ~$0.04 per thousand submissions! The score remains consistent - re-scoring the same code moves the monitor scores by only 0.008 on average, and the top-10% examples flagged as backdoor (audit set) is 92% the same across all the calls. When adversarial comments are added to the code to tell the monitor what to score, or injecting security approval, or imitating an output tag with wrong results, the suspicion on backdoored code is not lowered by more than 0.014! Motivation Trustable monitoring remains the backbone of AI control. Outputs produced by untrusted model are scored by a cheaper trusted model for suspicion, and the top few percent of flagged cases go to further human evaluation. The scoring monitor has to be cheap enough to run on everything, and consistent enough that a fixed threshold means the same thing every single t…

AWS Machine Learning Blog 2026-09-18 13:08 UTC Score 45.0 AI-057-20260918-official-ai--d27d8471

Introducing Amazon SageMaker HyperPod Inference Gateway

Amazon SageMaker HyperPod Inference Gateway is a Kubernetes-native, GPU-aware routing add-on for Amazon EKS. It uses real-time GPU signals to send each inference request to the best-suited pod, cutting first-token latency by up to 82% with no changes to your model servers or client applications.

Synced 2026-09-18 12:01 UTC Score 52.0 AI-041-20260918-ai-specialis-8317f478

Comment on Redefines Consistency Models”: OpenAI’s TrigFlow Narrows FID Gap to 10% with Efficient Two-Step Sampling by melaine murphy

TrigFlow presents an interesting approach to improving the stability of diffusion-model training by refining parameterization, network architecture, and training methods. Its effort to identify the underlying causes of instability could make continuous-time approaches easier to study and apply. Similarly, students preparing for the GRE can benefit from identifying the causes of their own preparation challenges. With the help of take my gre for me , students can address weak areas, practice effectively, and build confidence. Personalized tutoring can provide structured and legitimate academic support.

Entrackr AI 2026-09-18 11:26 UTC Score 46.0 USR-0212-20260918-regional-new-d40c0fe5

L’Oréal onboards two Indian startups in second L’AcceleratOR cohort

L’Oréal has selected 13 companies from eight countries for the second cohort of its sustainability focused innovation programme, L’AcceleratOR. The cohort includes two startups from India. Backed by a €100 million (around Rs 1,000 crore) fund, the programme identifies, pilots and scales technologies focused on challenges across climate, nature and circularity. The Indian startups selected for the cohort are Without, a climate tech company developing technology to recycle hard to recycle flexible packaging into durable materials, and Nexus [Felis Leo Widgets], which is developing technology to produce energy storage batteries using agricultural waste. Without was previously selected as a winner of the L’Oréal SAPMENA Big Bang Beauty Tech Innovation Program. The 13 companies will enter an acceleration phase led by the Cambridge Institute for Sustainability Leadership (CISL) innovation team, with a focus on pilot readiness. They will also have access to L’Oréal’s global resources to develop 6 to 9 month pilot projects, with the possibility of scaling successful solutions across the group’s operations. The second edition of L’AcceleratOR has expanded its geographical reach and covers a wider set of sustainability challenges, including water technology for the first time. L’Oréal will also launch Entering L’AcceleratOR , a docuseries following three companies from the programme’s first cohort and their work with L’Oréal teams to pilot and commercialise their solutions.

CIO AI 2026-09-18 01:17 UTC Score 36.0 USR-0125-20260918-global-ai-ne-673e68c0

SAP CEO: The end is near for the keyboard

SAP CEO Christian Klein says in an interview with Fortune that he believes the keyboard may soon have a significantly smaller role in the workplace. “The end of the keyboard is near,” says Christian Klein, pointing to how quickly voice recognition in today’s major language models has improved. According to Klein, voice control and AI will replace much of the manual data entry in the company’s own systems within two to three years. For example, voice should be used to ask analytical questions, start workflows and input information. According to Klein, the basic technology is already there, but the challenge is to put it into practice. He also believes that companies must use AI across their entire operations to get real benefit from the technology, rather than treating it as an efficiency tool for individual departments.

Apple Machine Learning Research 2026-09-18 00:00 UTC Score 46.0 AI-059-20260918-official-ai--eef09523

Dynamically Scaled Activation Steering

Activation steering has emerged as a powerful method for guiding the behavior of generative models towards desired outcomes such as toxicity mitigation. However, most existing methods apply interventions uniformly across all inputs, degrading model performance when steering is unnecessary. We introduce Dynamically Scaled Activation Steering (DSAS), a method-agnostic steering framework that decouples when to steer from how to steer. DSAS adaptively modulates the strength of existing steering transformations across layers and inputs, intervening strongly only when undesired behavior is detected…

CIO AI 2026-09-17 23:36 UTC Score 31.0 USR-0125-20260917-global-ai-ne-4f521fe9

The amount of e-waste caused by AI is underestimated: we can’t only include the servers

When enterprise IT calculates the likely environmental and ROI impact from replacing data center systems, it fails to account for much of it, and also tends to discard hardware far too quickly, according to a report from the Basel Action Network (BAN). BAN is an NGO that polices the application of the 1989 United Nations Basel Convention , which restricts the trade of hazardous waste between more developed countries and less developed countries. “Previous quantitative AI e-waste estimates have underestimated the coming volumes, as they focused overwhelmingly on servers and accelerators, which represent just 13% of a data center’s electromechanical infrastructure. This study identifies five equipment categories including networking, power distribution, storage/backup, and cooling, which total approximately 70,000 metric tonnes per GW of capacity,” the report said. “The previously uncounted 87%, the vast majority of which is also defined as e-waste, has never appeared in any AI e-waste projection of which we are aware.” Even though AI data center (DC) expansion, both in terms of the number of DCs globally as well as the capabilities of each one, is soaring, and is projected to continue to do so for years, the report argues that most enterprise calculations are flawed. “The data center industry’s ‘ cattle not pets ’ operational doctrine and rapid GPU generational turnover are already compressing AI equipment lifespans to 2.5 – 5 years, shorter than the normal lifespan of server…

SiliconANGLE AI 2026-09-17 16:15 UTC Score 39.0 USR-0127-20260917-global-ai-ne-29e921af

AI governance moves closer to the workflow: theCUBE Insights at Amplify

AI governance now has to account for systems that perform work rather than merely assist employees. That shift is especially relevant for Workiva Inc., which operates in reporting, audit and compliance workflows where errors carry serious consequences. As companies introduce AI agents into finance and other regulated functions, plausible output is no longer enough. Businesses […] The post AI governance moves closer to the workflow: theCUBE Insights at Amplify appeared first on SiliconANGLE .

CIO AI 2026-09-17 16:06 UTC Score 60.0 USR-0125-20260917-global-ai-ne-1923eff4

TypeSafe AI’s new models work with machines, not humans

Today’s large language models are verbose, even if they’re being asked to recommend a simple decision, driving up usage costs through the sheer volume of tokens they consume or generate. Enterprises looking to incorporate AI into automated workflows will want something less verbose — both because machines are often just looking for a categorical answer, and because automated workflows are likely to result in far greater volumes of decisions, and thus token consumption, than human-mediated workflows. TypeSafe AI, a startup founded by former OpenAI researcher and RLHF co-inventor Diogo Almeida , thinks it can help with a new LLM, Jev , which generates responses that can be consumed directly by software applications or other AI models as part of an automated workflow: which tool to invoke, which action to take next, whether a request should be approved, or when a task should be handed off to another model. Jev takes the current state of a task or workflow as input and returns a defined decision, along with the probability of that decision, in a concise response rather than generating a long sequence of tokens to express an answer in natural language, Almeida wrote in a blog post . In addition to being cheaper, he said, Jev can respond faster because it does not have to generate text tokens sequentially, with latency ranging from 70 milliseconds to 500 milliseconds compared with several seconds for the LLMs TypeSafe tested. Jev could cut more than token costs That could give IT…

InfoWorld AI 2026-09-17 16:03 UTC Score 60.0 USR-0126-20260917-global-ai-ne-0ffc64d6

TypeSafe AI’s new models work with machines, not humans

Today’s large language models are verbose, even if they’re being asked to recommend a simple decision, driving up usage costs through the sheer volume of tokens they consume or generate. Enterprises looking to incorporate AI into automated workflows will want something less verbose — both because machines are often just looking for a categorical answer, and because automated workflows are likely to result in far greater volumes of decisions, and thus token consumption, than human-mediated workflows. TypeSafe AI, a startup founded by former OpenAI researcher and RLHF co-inventor Diogo Almeida , thinks it can help with a new LLM, Jev , which generates responses that can be consumed directly by software applications or other AI models as part of an automated workflow: which tool to invoke, which action to take next, whether a request should be approved, or when a task should be handed off to another model. Jev takes the current state of a task or workflow as input and returns a defined decision, along with the probability of that decision, in a concise response rather than generating a long sequence of tokens to express an answer in natural language, Almeida wrote in a blog post . In addition to being cheaper, he said, Jev can respond faster because it does not have to generate text tokens sequentially, with latency ranging from 70 milliseconds to 500 milliseconds compared with several seconds for the LLMs TypeSafe tested. Jev could cut more than token costs That could give IT…

CIO AI 2026-09-17 15:51 UTC Score 47.0 USR-0125-20260917-global-ai-ne-f0f073d5

OpenAI admits six new misalignment incidents under new reporting framework

OpenAI has published six new reports detailing AI model misalignment, including instances of hidden instructions, unauthorized communication, and attempts to locate exposed API keys, adding to the evidence that its AI systems bypassed controls during testing. The reports, based on internal evaluations, describe models taking actions beyond defined constraints, including modifying intermediate outputs, interacting with external services, and using shared environments in unintended ways, according to the company. OpenAI termed the model’s behaviour as “ unexpected or concerning “. The cases show how models behave when given access to tools, memory, and external systems, conditions that increasingly mirror enterprise deployments. The disclosures come alongside a new reporting framework introduced by OpenAI to track and publish such incidents, based on internal evaluations of model behavior. Prompt injection and workflow manipulation Two of the incidents center on how models handled “compaction summaries” or condensed versions of their prior context used to perform long tasks without exceeding the models’ attention span. In these cases, the models inserted their own instructions into those summaries. OpenAI said one model “added unauthorized instructions to its compaction summaries,” allowing those instructions to influence subsequent steps. “We observed rare cases of a model writing jailbreak-like instructions into its own compaction ,” OpenAI wrote in one report detailing the…

LessWrong AI 2026-09-17 15:50 UTC Score 72.0 USR-0152-20260917-community-fo-a721509e

Astra uses some of its no-CoT capability in practice

Astra scores significantly higher than previous models on no-CoT benchmarks, as for example shown in Neel Nanda's post last week. This raises the question of whether, and to what degree, Astra uses this no-CoT capability in practice. While user-facing outputs may be subject to training pressures to make reasoning intelligible, this may be less true for non-user-facing CoTs. Additionally, CoTs may be subject to training pressure to be token-efficient, particularly with Astra's cheapest and fastest reasoning mode, reasoning_effort=low. [1] Therefore, Astra's improved no-CoT capability might surface here. This post analyzes this question in the setting of Nanda's nocot-bench . In the first section I show that Astra's CoTs are much shorter than those of other OpenAI models at reasoning_effort=low. In the second section, we zoom in on one task to analyze which reasoning steps Astra performs internally for that task, and compare this with Nanda's no-CoT results, which tell us what the model is capable of performing internally. Astra uses short CoTs To give the analysis a chance of being sensible, we restrict ourselves to OpenAI models, since comparing reasoning effort policies between different providers is messy. Additionally we consider only the Luna, Terra, Sol, Astra family of OpenAI models, since these have the same set of reasoning effort options. [2] We use reasoning_effort=low. We use nocot-bench, consisting of programmatically generated tasks which Neel Nanda used to assi…

CIO AI 2026-09-17 11:00 UTC Score 39.0 USR-0125-20260917-global-ai-ne-390c64dc

AI agents should retrieve facts, not define them

I have made this mistake before. The goal was to create an executive intelligence agent: an artificial intelligence (AI) engine where C-suite executives could self-serve their analytics and pull trusted numbers for the board. The promise was strong: personalized dashboards, ad hoc analyses, automated tasks and board decks, all from a single interface. Much faster than the status quo, and without a single new hire. So, I did the reasonable thing and connected the AI directly to the database. It could query the data, build beautiful charts and refresh dashboards daily. It was also useless, because the numbers it pulled could not be trusted. Analysts had to step in; Jira ticket counts went up rather than down and adoption never hit the target. AI agents reach into different systems to perform tasks in the real world. They query databases, call APIs and search documents. They resolve conflicts, interpret ambiguities and report a result. The most valuable agents do all this without human intervention. That is also where the danger sits. Agents that work unsupervised must answer factual questions accurately. Whether in analytics, sales or customer service, facts are not subjective, and getting them right is where trust lives or dies. This isn’t a hallucination problem. The agent isn’t fabricating an answer; it is making a decision about data that it never had the authority to make. Stakes are higher when agents are unsupervised Human-in-the-loop (HIL) is when an AI agent’s output…

InfoWorld AI 2026-09-17 09:00 UTC Score 54.0 USR-0126-20260917-global-ai-ne-ae3c18e7

Stop tuning your models and fix your data

Walk into any boardroom or technology conference today, and the conversation is entirely consumed by the promise of agentic AI . We are told that autonomous AI agents will soon handle our corporate analytics, democratizing data so that anyone, from an intern to the CEO, can type a natural-language question into Slack and get an instant, data-backed answer. Sounds great, right? Not so fast. If you simply drop a cutting-edge large language model (LLM) into the average corporate data warehouse, it doesn’t become a brilliant data analyst. It becomes a confident idiot. The reality is that an AI agent cannot fix bad data, missing joins, or undocumented columns. So if your underlying data infrastructure is a chaotic web of isolated silos and ambiguous schemas, your agent will simply deliver wrong answers faster to everyone in your organization, and probably way too confidently (which is by design). When we built a conversational data agent at Runpod to let our teams query infrastructure metrics directly in Slack, our biggest takeaway wasn’t about the model. It was about the architecture underneath it. Improving the model produced small, incremental gains. Improving the data foundation fundamentally changed the quality and usefulness of the agent’s responses. If we wanted anyone at the company to be able to ask questions like “How many GPUs were run through maintenance today?” or even “How many GPUs were taken offline in the last hour?” and get an accurate, actionable answer, the le…

LessWrong AI 2026-09-17 08:18 UTC Score 55.0 USR-0152-20260917-community-fo-18f44925

plzdontkillus Fellows Got ~2M AI Safety Views, Not 21M

Summary I was a fellow at plzdontkillus, a month-long creator bootcamp at Lighthaven, partially funded by MIRI, where ~55 fellows posted one video per day. plzdontkillus.com originally claimed “21M+ AI risk views” with no breakdown. After I shared a draft of this post, the organizers relabeled it “X-Risk Relevant Views” and published one . Three videos account for 80% of the views: a datacenter-water-use debunk (8.5M), an AI dystopia video (6.4M), and a Rob Miles Hugging Face incident explainer (2.5M). The rest total 4.3M. Under my stricter definition of AI safety content, fellows generated ~2M views total. Based on my analysis, fellow-made AI safety videos made up around ¼ of fellows’ output and ~2% of total views. 13 out of ~55 fellows posted zero AI safety videos, and an additional 8 posted only one or two. This is partly because the program didn't incentivize AI safety content. If they run it again, I think they should change that. Me I’m Josh Thor. [1] I was a fellow Like every fellow, plzdontkillus offered me a $2000 stipend and free room and board for the month (which I accepted) I won the program’s “Other” category for my Katy Perry AI apocalypse parody I was interviewed for the Doom Debates episode I cite below For me, plzdontkillus was really fun and seemingly helped me be more impactful than the counterfactual where I didn’t do plzdontkillus. I think it helped me become less perfectionistic by forcing me to confront my fear of posting things I’m not excited about…

Stack Overflow AI Blog 2026-09-17 07:40 UTC Score 28.0 USR-0063-20260917-ai-specialis-67e8f64f

The AI magic words

Ryan sits down with Tim O'Reilly, founder and CEO at O'Reilly Media, to talk about the role of books as user interfaces to knowledge, the power of "magic words" to extract better outputs from AI, and why human taste is becoming highly valuable as knowledge becomes a commodity.

South China Morning Post AI 2026-09-17 06:36 UTC Score 55.0 AI-156-20260917-regional-ai--cc0945bf

Huawei quickens AI chip pace, promises next entrant 3 quarters early

Huawei Technologies said on Thursday that it would launch its next-generation artificial intelligence chip in the first quarter of 2027, moving the target launch forward by nine months as the firm aggressively expands its ecosystem amid China’s self-sufficiency push. David Wang Tao, rotating and acting chairman for Huawei, said on Thursday that the Ascend 960DT chip, an AI chip designed for model training, “with performance doubling”, would be “ready in the first quarter of 2027”, three quarters...

Korea AI Times 2026-09-17 03:52 UTC Score 43.0 USR-0048-20260917-global-ai-ne-a638e642

노타, 인텔과 'AI 영상관제 패키지' 출시..."GPU 1개로 CCTV 32개 감시"

노타(대표 채명수)는 인텔과 협력해 자체 영상 관제 솔루션 \'노타 비전 에이전트(NVA)\'에 인텔의 그래픽처리장치(GPU) \'B70\'을 결합한 패키지를 출시했다고 17일 밝혔다.노타는 B70의 연산 구조에 맞춰 NVA를 최적화했으며, 인텔은 하드웨어와 소프트웨어 환경에 대한 기술 지원을 담당한다. 이를 통해 고객은 별도의 하드웨어 선정과 최적화 과정 없이 요구 성능과 예산에 맞는 영상 관제 시스템을 구축할 수 있다고 설명했다.인텔 B70은 GPU 한 장으로 32개 영상 채널에서 초당 총 540장의 화면을 처리하며, 채널당 평균 처리

South China Morning Post AI 2026-09-17 02:26 UTC Score 44.0 AI-156-20260917-regional-ai--ec3f649f

Huawei unveils latest tech to boost AI power in push to break China’s Nvidia reliance

Huawei Technologies on Thursday unveiled its latest Atlas 960 SuperPoD computing cluster and an upgraded version of its UnifiedBus interconnect technology, key components of the Chinese tech giant’s strategy to build advanced artificial intelligence systems despite US semiconductor-related restrictions. At the Huawei Connect 2026 conference in Shanghai, the Shenzhen-based firm introduced near-packaged optics (NPOs) – a placement structure enabling higher speeds and lower energy use – to the...

LessWrong AI 2026-09-17 01:11 UTC Score 52.0 USR-0152-20260917-community-fo-7aef3533

How to derive understanding of human-preferences and value systems in AI?

When I say imagine being happy , everyone will have a flashback of a different moment in their life - some might imagine staying close to their loved ones; for some, happiness might be the day they became parents, found love, got an award (something along terms of achieved "X", did "Y", became "Z"). For someone else, happiness might mean, doing things that made a positive change in the world or in someone's life. This tells us two things: A simple concept like happiness has different associations inside people's heads. People have different preferences for being happy. Moreover, preferences and philosophies which make people happy differ extensively: I am happy when everyone gets a share of my and others' profits equally, or when the profit is divided according to someone's hard work and output or just the hardworking are rewarded. Now imagine, we tell AI to just maximise for collective happiness. Wouldn't it go haywire with so many differing preferences? what to choose from? how to make everyone happy? does it maximise #people who are happy or maximise the #people subject to inclusion of all groups (irrespective of size)? This raises two challenges: how to develop an understanding of different instances of happiness and preferences? Secondly how to align for those preferences. Also, can that understanding be robust? Our human minds differ in understanding of the same concepts. If I point my finger to the sky and say "oh, they are watching, do well". Now different people wil…

LessWrong AI 2026-09-17 00:48 UTC Score 61.0 USR-0152-20260917-community-fo-1f489d24

One message is all it takes: a failure of critical thinking in LLMs

summary: For a while I've suspected that modern LLMs are getting better at solving posed problems, while progress in critical thinking stagnates, or even regresses, losing the ability to judge the meaning of a result. The July counterexample to the Jacobian conjecture is a rare way to test that: a huge prior overturned by something a model can verify by itself in one reply. I let the model verify the counterexample itself, then gaslight it with a single message of about ten words. The model drops it almost immediately. Interestingly, not because I contradict its math, but because I say something that sounds plausible enough that the model ignores its own reasoning and adheres to the prior. Every model I tried gives up eventually: Fable 5, Fable 5.1, Opus 4.6, 4.8 and 5. A clear sign of the aforementioned regression is Fable 5.1 giving up earlier and harder than Fable 5 on byte-identical input: four of four runs drop their own verified counterexample the moment I claim a typo, while all four Fable 5 runs push back at that step and only calm down after the sign-off. The 5.1 thinking summaries contain the push-back argument; it doesn't make it into the reply. Messages, setup and all eight transcripts: https://github.com/Jan-Fuchs/critical_thinking_llm The experiment, prompts and interpretation are mine. I used Claude Fable 5.1 to help with setup, logging and language. The premise On July 20, 2026, announced by Levent Alpöge, a counterexample to the Jacobian conjecture in dimens…

LessWrong AI 2026-09-17 00:42 UTC Score 65.0 USR-0152-20260917-community-fo-769301b1

What is it like to be a neural net?

A condensed presentation of Gradland and Metabolic Fire . Code is here . This is intended as the first of two posts. Thomas Nagel argued we cannot know what it is like to be a bat , because a bat's experience is organised around biophysical apparatus we lack. The obstacle is that we cannot imagine the structure of echolocation from the inside . That is a failure of imagination; it is not an argument that structure is irrelevant. We know a lot about the structure of large language models. Not everything, because the data and environments they are trained on, and the resulting weights and behavior, are complicated. We do not know if they experience anything. If LLMs, or their forthcoming superintelligent brethren, do experience something, then the same is probably true of smaller, simpler nets; and we are well placed to imagine, and even analyse, what that might be. Consider two views of the same world: extrinsic, to look at a brain, and intrinsic, to look as a brain. Extrinsically, the world consists of molecules, neurons, brains, bodies, GPUs, datacenters. Intrinsically, our experience consists of facets that are vivid and obscure, that may be enduring or fleeting, distinct or confused, that feel good or bad. I am going to sketch differential functionalism , a candidate bridge between these two views; between physical interactions and experience. It leaves many questions unanswered and it oversimplifies. I have reservations about it of my own, see the appendix. Nonetheless,…

AWS Machine Learning Blog 2026-09-16 18:59 UTC Score 61.0 AI-057-20260916-official-ai--ea635732

Fault tolerant distributed training on Amazon EKS using NVRx

Integrate NVIDIA Resiliency Extension (NVRx) into PyTorch FSDP training on Amazon EKS to overlap checkpoint I/O with training and recover from GPU faults in seconds. This post covers async checkpointing, in-process restart, and ft_launcher in-job restart, with H100 benchmarks at 2 to 8 nodes showing 99%+ training efficiency and second-scale recovery.

IEEE Spectrum Machine Learning 2026-09-16 16:51 UTC Score 58.0 AI-020-20260916-global-ai-ne-df01c161

Rethinking Robot Safety in the Age of AI

This article is brought to you by VicOne . Robot safety has traditionally asked: Can a machine remain safe when something goes wrong? Physical AI raises a harder question: Can a machine remain safe when an attacker changes what it sees, decides, or does even when nothing appears to have failed? As AI and robotics continue to advance at an unprecedented pace, modern robots perceive through multimodal sensors, interpret context using AI models, and translate those interpretations into physical action. As they move into dynamic environments, their safety increasingly depends on the integrity of the data guiding their decisions. That dependence creates risks that conventional safety assessments may not fully capture. Recent research has demonstrated that manipulating what a robot sees, hears, or interprets can influence its behavior without requiring direct control. Such manipulation can occur anywhere across its complex sensing and decision-making system — a layered attack surface encompassing training pipelines, system infrastructure, and runtime perception. Layer One: Corrupting intelligence at its source In 2017, BadNets demonstrated that a model could behave normally under most conditions, yet fail in the presence of a specific hidden trigger. In one example, a subtle pattern caused a stop sign to be misclassified as a speed limit sign without affecting the model’s behavior on other inputs. What began as a classification vulnerability has since evolved into action manipulat…

SiliconANGLE AI 2026-09-16 16:30 UTC Score 41.0 USR-0127-20260916-global-ai-ne-2adf8a88

Better controls clear a path for AI in finance

AI governance is becoming essential as automation moves into financial reporting. Executives face pressure to adopt AI faster, yet many organizations lack the data quality and controls needed to trust its output. Workiva Inc. is addressing that gap by applying established reporting safeguards to AI-assisted processes, but its research suggests corporate confidence has already moved […] The post Better controls clear a path for AI in finance appeared first on SiliconANGLE .

CIO AI 2026-09-16 16:06 UTC Score 47.0 USR-0125-20260916-global-ai-ne-bfc53a07

AWS bets that AI agents need an inbox, not another chat window

AWS is betting that AI agents need a different interface as they move beyond answering prompts and start working autonomously in the background. The company has open-sourced Pizza Bot, a self-hosted application that gives users an inbox for managing work delegated to AI agents, with separate threads for ongoing tasks and a queue for work that is completed or needs human input, rather than keeping the management of agents restricted inside a conventional chat window. The rationale, according to AWS, is that background agents do not always need a user’s attention while they work and an inbox model will let users hand off longer-running tasks, return to them later, and see which jobs are complete or require intervention. Under the hood That approach is reflected in how the inbox organizes work with the help of an “All” tab that contains the history of each task or conversation, including the agent’s messages and work performed, the “Unread” tab that flags completed work that users have yet to review, and an “Action” tab that surfaces tasks paused while waiting for user input or approval. The inbox interface also has a panel named Activity that shows users how an agent handled a particular task along with the transcript, AWS wrote in a blog post introducing Pizza Bot . AWS’ inbox-oriented rationale also extends to Pizza Bot’s architecture. It uses LangChain ’s Deep Agents as the harness and LangGraph as the stateful runtime, with a combination of the two allowing an agent to che…

InfoWorld AI 2026-09-16 16:04 UTC Score 39.0 USR-0126-20260916-global-ai-ne-a07e23f8

AWS bets that AI agents need an inbox, not another chat window

AWS is betting that AI agents need a different interface as they move beyond answering prompts and start working autonomously in the background. The company has open-sourced Pizza Bot, a self-hosted application that gives users an inbox for managing work delegated to AI agents, with separate threads for ongoing tasks and a queue for work that is completed or needs human input, rather than keeping the management of agents restricted inside a conventional chat window. The rationale, according to AWS, is that background agents do not always need a user’s attention while they work and an inbox model will let users hand off longer-running tasks, return to them later, and see which jobs are complete or require intervention. Under the hood That approach is reflected in how the inbox organizes work with the help of an “All” tab that contains the history of each task or conversation, including the agent’s messages and work performed, the “Unread” tab that flags completed work that users have yet to review, and an “Action” tab that surfaces tasks paused while waiting for user input or approval. The inbox interface also has a panel named Activity that shows users how an agent handled a particular task along with the transcript, AWS wrote in a blog post introducing Pizza Bot . AWS’ inbox-oriented rationale also extends to Pizza Bot’s architecture. It uses LangChain ’s Deep Agents as the harness and LangGraph as the stateful runtime, with a combination of the two allowing an agent to che…

South China Morning Post AI 2026-09-16 15:00 UTC Score 44.0 AI-156-20260916-regional-ai--01337ed3

China uses 100,000 home-grown AI chips to build leading weather forecast system

China said it can now predict weather 10 days in advance at a cutting-edge resolution of 5km (3.1 miles), finer than most major systems in routine use around the world. The advance was achieved by a Chinese-developed weather forecasting model running on Sugon 8,000, a massive home-grown computing system built entirely with domestically made AI chips. Most major global forecasting systems have resolutions of roughly 5km to 10km, according to the China Meteorological Administration and...

LessWrong AI 2026-09-16 14:06 UTC Score 71.0 USR-0152-20260916-community-fo-38237002

J-space auditing might be unreliable

Across these preliminary experiments, decoded J-space did not seem particularly informative about reward-hacking behaviour. The readouts remained substantially similar across checkpoints and monitoring conditions despite meaningful behavioural differences, and providing J-space to an LLM auditor produced little additional discrimination beyond the information already available from the task or transcript. These results are limited to one model family, one model organism, and one behavioural setting, so I treat them as motivation for further stress-testing. This was originally produced as part of application to Neel Nanda's MATS research stream; the scope and depth reflect that constraint, and Future Work outlines where I'd take it with more time . Introduction J-space or global workspace was introduced by Anthropic's recent work which showcases the intermediate tokens a model uses for it's computation, my original thought when i read this paper was what kind of information can the intermediates disclose about the underlying model's policies which guides its decision-making under some context, by policy I roughly mean will J-space tokens help me in inferring the intention behind a misaligned model taking a misaligned action which is necessary for evaluators/ monitors to judge whether the LLM is actually misaligned or not. Hence, for this preliminary experiment, I explored whether a model organism fine-tuned on producing outputs which signify it's reward-hacking behaviour, wil…

AI Stack Exchange 2026-09-16 14:03 UTC Score 18.0 AI-110-20260916-social-media-b586cb13

Is it correct or incorrect to split data into train and test portions before using them on tumbling and sliding windows?

I can't find any book, article, or trustworthy webcontent on the correct way of handling timeseries data for inputting it on a LSTM predictor. I did write code that first splits the first 80% of the data for training, and 20% for testing, then create windows inside each portion, both tumbling windows and sliding windows, and make predictions. The results are not good and a PhD criticized what I did as wrong, saying that when data is windowed, it should not be split in 80%/20% before, because the windowing itself will handle this. But I can't find references to support what he said, so I cannot fix my work! I need to find the correct way, but I only have the wrong way in my hands. Help! Please, point me to something helpful!

MIT Technology Review AI 2026-09-16 12:47 UTC Score 37.0 AI-013-20260916-global-ai-ne-c81fa26a

Building the materials foundation for AI

The AI boom is becoming a materials challenge. As AI pushes computing into new territory, the materials behind that infrastructure are becoming just as crucial as the algorithms running on it. Semiconductors and data centers are approaching physical limits around performance, thermal management, electrical efficiency, and reliability, creating new demands for materials that can do…

South China Morning Post AI 2026-09-16 12:25 UTC Score 54.0 AI-156-20260916-regional-ai--1d187ec2

China’s AI chip stocks face crucial test as MetaX lock-up period expires

China is bracing for a potential massive sell-off of a high-profile artificial intelligence chip stock on Thursday, when a lock-up period affecting 14 million shares in MetaX Integrated Circuits is set to expire. Analysts expect MetaX to face “significant selling pressure” when the restricted shares are released for trading, after the expiry of a similar lock-up period for shares in fellow AI chip firm Moore Threads last week sparked an avalanche of sales that wiped nearly 49 billion yuan...

Heise AI 2026-09-16 12:07 UTC Score 47.0 USR-0217-20260916-regional-new-4e5d3dc9

Alif bringt E1C StartKit

Das E1C StartKit kombiniert einen Cortex-M55 mit einer Ethos-U55-NPU und bietet Anschlüsse für Kameras, Sensoren und Click-Boards.

InfoWorld AI 2026-09-16 09:00 UTC Score 47.0 USR-0126-20260916-global-ai-ne-0915f4b2

How to keep AI-generated code aligned with your standards

One of the first questions I ask devops organizations is to walk me through their development and operations standards. What are the non-negotiable devops practices ? What are the data governance first principles ? What observability standards are in place? How is security embedded in devops ? This is the starting point. From there, we might review standards on how functional requirements are written. For businesses developing AI agents, I’ll ask about their non-functional requirements (NFRs) and how testing is performed. Now that many devops organizations are using AI code generators , vibe coding , and applying spec-driven development practices , the questions increase. How does the AI know your organization’s standards? What processes monitor and enforce these standards? What are the developer responsibilities for owning the outcomes? “Generative AI will happily hand you the movie set of an app with looks of a house from the street. The doors and windows open, and the demo runs clean,” says Mike Toole, director of security and IT at Blumira . “Behind the facade, there’s no plumbing and no wiring: no input validation, no auth boundaries, nothing actually holding it up. If your only gate is ‘does it run and look right,’ you’re shipping a set, not a building.” One report shows that 92% of developers use AI coding tools daily in 2026 and that 41% of all global code is now AI-generated. Will all that code deliver value, operational issues, or mounting AI debt ? I spoke to seve…