Cross Validated
2024-04-23 16:52 UTC
By Marco Miglionico
AI-113-20240423-social-media-7600ca87
Causal Inference: Meta Learners usage
I have been running causal inference using Econ ML package on my data. I have a dataset containing customers divided into treatment and control and many other features. I run matching on those and obtained a matched dataset that contains the matched treat and control. If I calculate the difference in the avg outcome Y between the 2 matched group I get an ATE of 3. Now my question is if I train a Meta Learner, ex. X learner on the data before match and then use it to estimate the ATE on that matched dataset I have, am I supposed to get an ATE very close to 3? Or not? If not what is the reason? This is the part that is not clear to me.
I have been running causal inference using Econ ML package on my data. I have a dataset containing customers divided into treatment and control and many other features. I run matching on those and obtained a matched dataset that contains the matched treat and control. If I calculate the difference in the avg outcome Y between the 2 matched group I get an ATE of 3. Now my question is if I train a Meta Learner, ex. X learner on the data before match and then use it to estimate the ATE on that matched dataset I have, am I supposed to get an ATE very close to 3? Or not? If not what is the reason? This is the part that is not clear to me.
Full article content could not be extracted automatically. Read the original below.
Source:
Cross Validated
· stats.stackexchange.com