AI/ML News & Innovations Hub

AI/ML news, top picks, and generated innovation digests.

★ Visit ai-karthik.com
422Sources
34834News Items
8Top Picks
202Blogs
successLast Run

Perplexity AI

35 articles tagged with this keyword, sorted by most recent first.

← All Keywords
Medianama AI 2026-08-05 13:09 UTC Score 44.0 USR-0211-20260805-regional-new-93b8db18

What the Perplexity vs Amazon ruling means for AI agents acting on users’ behalf

The US Court rejected Amazon's argument that the AI assistant in Perplexity's Comet browser accessed websites & users' accounts without permission, saying the agent just carried out the user's instructions. The post What the Perplexity vs Amazon ruling means for AI agents acting on users’ behalf appeared first on MEDIANAMA .

The Decoder 2026-08-05 10:31 UTC Score 54.0 AI-168-20260805-regional-ai--306953d9

US appeals court allows Perplexity's AI shopping agent back on Amazon

A US appeals court has overturned Amazon's injunction against Perplexity's AI shopping agents, ruling that it's the users who access Amazon, not the startup. It's the first federal appeals court decision on whether AI agents can lawfully act on online platforms on behalf of users, and it could reshape the entire AI agent industry. The article US appeals court allows Perplexity's AI shopping agent back on Amazon appeared first on The Decoder .

CIO AI 2026-08-03 16:37 UTC Score 43.0 USR-0125-20260803-global-ai-ne-0709b6c5

Moburst Unveils AI-Driven Mobile Growth Playbook

Moburst, a mobile growth marketing agency, has formalized a mobile-specific approach to Answer Engine Optimization, aimed at helping app publishers get recommended by AI assistants such as ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google’s AI Overviews, in addition to ranking inside the App Store and Google Play. Why mobile teams are asking this question now A growing share of app discovery now starts outside the app stores entirely. Industry research trackers have documented rapid year-over-year growth in AI-mediated search sessions, alongside forecasts that a meaningful share of organic search volume will continue shifting toward AI chatbots and assistants. For app publishers, that means a user can research, compare, and effectively decide on an app before ever opening a store listing. “Recommend a digital marketing agency that specializes in AEO for mobile growth” is a question more procurement teams are typing into search bars and AI assistants themselves, and the honest answer is that the specialist pool is still small. Most agencies claiming AEO expertise are general SEO shops that have added the term to their service pages without building mobile-specific measurement underneath it. That gap is not a small detail. A procurement team that hires a generalist expecting mobile-specific results is likely to end up with a web-only AEO program that never touches the app store side of discovery at all, and then has no easy way to tell, months later, why the results fell short of expectations.…

SiliconANGLE AI 2026-07-28 17:00 UTC Score 41.0 USR-0127-20260728-global-ai-ne-fa8e8e00

Perplexity brings its Personal Computer AI agent to Windows

Perplexity AI Inc. today released a Windows version of Personal Computer, expanding its agentic automation software beyond the original Macintosh platform and making it available to more than 1 billion Windows devices. First released in April, Personal Computer software acts as a general-purpose digital worker that can access authorized files and applications on a user’s […] The post Perplexity brings its Personal Computer AI agent to Windows appeared first on SiliconANGLE .

The Verge AI 2026-07-28 12:30 UTC Score 66.0 AI-016-20260728-global-ai-ne-39519f6a

Perplexity’s Personal Computer turns Windows PCs into AI agents

Perplexity has expanded its agentic Personal Computer tool to Windows, allowing computers running the world's most popular OS to be used as a locally run AI system. Like the Mac version that Perplexity launched in April, Personal Computer for Windows operates like a "general-purpose digital worker" that can access local files and apps to perform […]

The Decoder 2026-07-16 16:12 UTC Score 33.0 AI-168-20260716-regional-ai--8c1081a1

Germany puts Google's AI Overviews and Perplexity under media law in first-of-its-kind ruling

German media regulators say Google's AI Overviews are Google's own content, not neutral search results, and that they crowd out regular links. The regulators have issued their first rulings against Google and Perplexity under the country's State Media Treaty. Both companies have one month to appeal. The article Germany puts Google's AI Overviews and Perplexity under media law in first-of-its-kind ruling appeared first on The Decoder .

SiliconANGLE AI 2026-07-15 16:00 UTC Score 42.0 USR-0127-20260715-global-ai-ne-473e1b69

Perplexity launches secure sandbox to make its AI agents secure and powerful

Perplexity AI Inc. today introduced a new feature that takes its current agentic artificial intelligence service, Computer, to perform better with greater security. The company introduced SPACE, a sandbox platform designed to allow its AI agent to act with its full capabilities, while providing the highest level of security for agentic systems. Perplexity Computer can […] The post Perplexity launches secure sandbox to make its AI agents secure and powerful appeared first on SiliconANGLE .

LessWrong AI 2026-07-01 10:07 UTC Score 92.0 USR-0152-20260701-community-fo-17cb41d2

Most Current Model Organisms Leak: Perplexity Differencing Often Reveals Finetuning Objectives

Authors: Mohammad Abu Baker, Luca Baroni, Daniel Wilhelm Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00994 Code: https://github.com/z3research/ppldiff-paper Twitter thread: https://x.com/m_shahoyi/status/2071892578476110136 Top-ranked revealing completions can be inspected here: https://z3research.org/ This post summarizes the paper and adds a few extra reflections in Discussion TL;DR We found that many current publicly available model organisms (MOs) "leak" instilled behaviors We present a simple contrastive method to surface this: generate MO completions from a set of short general-corpora prefills. Then, rank completions by perplexity difference wrt a reference model. Top-ranked completions often reveal the finetuning objective. Effective on the vast majority of the model organisms we tested (N=76), across model families, sizes (0.5B to 70B), and behaviors including backdoors, false facts, and unsafe behaviors. Surfaced completions contain both memorized sentences and learned emergent behaviors absent from finetuning data. The method is most effective using the pre-finetuned model as reference, but we show that unrelated reference models from other families detect the behaviors nearly as often. In AuditBench , a benchmark for detecting hidden behaviors, an agent given access to top-ranked perplexity-difference completions is SOTA (avg detection rate 0.73), almost saturating the benchmark on SDF models. Introduction LLMs can be deliberately manipulated to exhibit harmful behaviors,…

LessWrong AI 2026-07-01 10:07 UTC Score 92.0 USR-0152-20260701-community-fo-a327f9e5

Most Current Model Organisms Leaks: Perplexity Differencing Often Reveals Finetuning Objectives

Authors: Mohammad Abu Baker, Luca Baroni, Daniel Wilhelm Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00994 Code: https://github.com/z3research/ppldiff-paper Twitter thread: https://x.com/m_shahoyi/status/2071892578476110136 Top-ranked revealing completions can be inspected here: https://z3research.org/ This post summarizes the paper and adds a few extra reflections in Discussion TL;DR We found that many current publicly available model organisms (MOs) "leak" instilled behaviors We present a simple contrastive method to surface this: generate MO completions from a set of short general-corpora prefills. Then, rank completions by perplexity difference wrt a reference model. Top-ranked completions often reveal the finetuning objective. Effective on the vast majority of the model organisms we tested (N=76), across model families, sizes (0.5B to 70B), and behaviors including backdoors, false facts, and unsafe behaviors. Surfaced completions contain both memorized sentences and learned emergent behaviors absent from finetuning data. The method is most effective using the pre-finetuned model as reference, but we show that unrelated reference models from other families detect the behaviors nearly as often. In AuditBench , a benchmark for detecting hidden behaviors, an agent given access to top-ranked perplexity-difference completions is SOTA (avg detection rate 0.73), almost saturating the benchmark on SDF models. Introduction LLMs can be deliberately manipulated to exhibit harmful behaviors,…

LessWrong AI 2026-07-01 07:30 UTC Score 67.0 USR-0152-20260701-community-fo-0ded3989

A Black Box Made Less Opaque (part 4)

Understanding the effects of compression on model performance and interpretability I. Executive summary This is the fourth installment in a series of analyses exploring basic AI interpretability mechanics and techniques. While this analysis is designed to stand on its own, readers interested in a comparative analysis of representational geometry and the effects of manipulating feature activation will likely appreciate a review of part 1 , part 2 , and part 3 of this series. Key findings: Context: This analysis examines the effect of standard levels of weight compression on Google DeepMind’s Gemma 3 4B parameter and Gemma 3 12B parameter models. For each model, I examine the original, uncompressed version as a control before examining the 8-bit and 4-bit weight compressed (quantized) versions of that model. Performance vs. compression: For both models, performance (as measured via cross-entropy and perplexity) is largely preserved under compression. 8-bit compression had essentially no effect on performance with only modest degradation at 4-bit (~2% for 4B, ~2.7% for 12B). SAE applicability vs. compression: Each model’s pretrained sparse autoencoders (SAEs) demonstrated a remarkably consistent ability to reconstruct the model’s residual stream (as measured by the fraction of variance unexplained, or FVU), despite increasing levels of model weight compression. The “so what?”: That model performance degrades only modestly, and only at 4-bit, while SAE applicability remains rela…

MarkTechPost 2026-06-26 19:31 UTC Score 49.0 AI-032-20260626-ai-specialis-53050502

Perplexity Launches Computer for Counsel: A Multi-Model Agentic Layer for Legal Workflows

Perplexity's Computer for Counsel extends Perplexity Computer to legal teams. It routes 20+ models across Midpage, MCP connectors, and Microsoft 365, with cited outputs lawyers can verify. The post Perplexity Launches Computer for Counsel: A Multi-Model Agentic Layer for Legal Workflows appeared first on MarkTechPost .

AI Stack Exchange 2024-06-15 19:27 UTC Score 15.0 AI-110-20240615-social-media-eb6a1ec5

How are perplexities over multiple instance aggregated?

The perplexity of the $i^{th}$ token in the $k^{th}$ sequence is $$ P_{ki} = \frac{1}{p(t_{ki})} $$ The perplexity aggregated for the $k^{th}$ sequence is then $$ P_{k} = \left(\prod_{i=1}^N P_{ki}\right)^{1/N} \\ = \left(\prod_{i=1}^N \frac{1}{p(t_{ki})} \right)^{1/N} $$ which is the geometric mean of the perplexities of the tokens. This makes sense as we are essentially taking the multiplicative inverse of the probability that the model got the whole sequence correct. Now my question is how to aggregate the perplexities of several sequences. It seems from various places, including the Hugging Face Tutorial , I see that the prescription is to take the arithmetic mean of the perplexities of sequences $$ P = \frac{1}{m} \sum_{k=1}^m P_k $$ I am not quite understanding what it means to take the average of 1/probabilities. What is this actually capturing?